Self Studies

Criminal Law Test-1

Result Self Studies

Criminal Law Test-1
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person 's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.

    Explanation 1: A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being moveable property is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being he subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.

    Explanation 2: A moving effected by the same act which effects the severance may be a theft.

    Explanation 3: A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.

    Explanation 4: A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.

    Explanation 5: The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied and may be given either by the person in possession or by any person having for that purpose authority either express or implied.

    Facts:  Y cuts down a tree on Z 's ground with the intention of dishonestly taking it out of  Z 's possession without Z 's consent. Y could not take away the tree.

    Solution

    • Y has committed theft. 
    • As soon as Y severed tree belonging to Z from Z 's land the tree became subject of theft.
    • As soon as Y did an act to take away a property belonging to Z from his possession he has committed theft. Actual taking away of the property is not a necessary and mere change in property with the intention of taking it away is theft. 

  • Question 2
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person 's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.

    Explanation 1: A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being moveable property is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being he subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.

    Explanation 2: A moving effected by the same act which effects the severance may be a theft.

    Explanation 3: A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.

    Explanation 4: A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.

    Explanation 5: The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied and may be given either by the person in possession or by any person having for that purpose authority either express or implied.

    Facts:  A finds a ring belonging to Z on a table in the house which Z occupies. Here the ring is in Z ’s possession, and if A dishonest ­ly removes it

    Solution

    The answer is A because A dishonestly removes it from ownership of Z.

  • Question 3
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person 's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.

    Explanation 1: A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being moveable property is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being he subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.

    Explanation 2: A moving effected by the same act which effects the severance may be a theft.

    Explanation 3: A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.

    Explanation 4: A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.

    Explanation 5: The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied and may be given either by the person in possession or by any person having for that purpose authority either express or implied.

    Facts: A finds a ring lying on the high road, not in the possession of any person. A by taking it commits …….

    Solution

    According to the principle the taking away of the property must be done dishonestly.-Dishonesty, as defined in section 24of IPC, consists of two main ingredients it says that an act is done which cause either ‘wrongful gain 'or ‘wrongful loss 'is said to be done dishonestly. Dishonesty must have the element of mens rea to cause loss or gain to oneself. There should be an intention of taking property from the possession of another. Such intention must be to cause wrongful gain to oneself or wrongful loss to another. 

  • Question 4
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person 's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.

    Explanation 1: A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being moveable property is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being he subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.

    Explanation 2: A moving effected by the same act which effects the severance may be a theft.

    Explanation 3: A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.

    Explanation 4: A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.

    Explanation 5: The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied and may be given either by the person in possession or by any person having for that purpose authority either express or implied.

    Facts: If A owes money to Z for repairing the watch, and if Z retains the watch lawfully as a security for the debt, and A takes the watch out of Z 's possession, with the intention of depriving Z of the property as a security for his debt.

    Solution

    Taking the current situation, i.e., the watch was in Z 's possession and he owned it until A does not pay the money for its repairment. Now, A has moved a movable property (watch) out of Z 's (owner 's) possession without his consent (secretly) with dishonest intention (so that A need not pay the money), A is liable to theft. So, the correct answer is option D.

  • Question 5
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person 's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.

    Explanation 1: A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being moveable property is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being he subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.

    Explanation 2: A moving effected by the same act which effects the severance may be a theft.

    Explanation 3: A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle which prevented from moving or by separating it from any other thing, as well as by actually moving it.

    Explanation 4: A person, who by any means causes an animal to move, is said to move that animal, and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.

    Explanation 5: The consent mentioned in the definition may be express or implied and may be given either by the person in possession or by any person having for that purpose authority either express or implied.

    Facts: A, in good faith, believing property belonging to Z to be A 's own property, takes that property out of Z 's possession.

    Solution

    A is not guilty of theft; but if A, after discovering his mistake, dishonestly appropriates the property to his own use, he is guilty of an offence under this section.

  • Question 6
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits "extortion ".

    Facts: A threatens to publish a defamatory libel concerning Z unless Z gives him money

    Solution

    Extortion  (also called shakedown, outwrestling and exaction) is a criminal offense of obtaining money, property, or services from an individual or institution, through coercion. Extortion  is commonly practiced by organized crime groups. The actual obtainment of money or property is not required to  commit  the offense.

  • Question 7
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits "extortion ".

    Facts: A, by putting Z in fear of grievous hurt, dishonestly induces Z to sign or affix his seal to a blank paper and deliver it to A. Z signs and delivers the paper to A.

    Solution

    Here, as the paper so signed may be converted into a valuable security. A has committed extor ­tion.

  • Question 8
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: Whoever intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits "extortion ".

    Facts: A threatens Z that he will keep Z 's child in wrongful confinement; unless Z will sign and deliver to A a promissory note binding Z to pay certain monies to A. Z signs and delivers the note.

    Solution

    A has committed extortion as he put Z in fear by threatening Z 's child for wrongful confinement and dishonestly induces him and put in fear for delivering a promissory note

  • Question 9
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: In all robbery there is either theft or extortion

    When theft is robbery: Theft is "robbery "if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

    When extortion is robbery: Extortion is "robbery "if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the

    Explanation: The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

    Facts: A holds Z down, and fraudulently takes Z 's money and jewels from Z 's clothes, without Z 's consent.

    Solution

    Here A has committed theft, and, in order to the committing of that theft, has voluntarily caused wrongful restraint to Z. A has therefore committed robbery.

  • Question 10
    1 / -0.25

    Principle: In all robbery there is either theft or extortion

    When theft is robbery: Theft is "robbery "if, in order to the committing of the theft, or in committing the theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint, or fear of instant death or of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

    When extortion is robbery: Extortion is "robbery "if the offender, at the time of committing the extortion, is in the presence of the person put in fear, and commits the

    Explanation: The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint.

    Facts: A meets Z on the high roads, show a pistol, and demands Z 's purse. Z, in consequence, surrenders his purse.

    Solution

    Here A has extorted the purse from Z by putting him in fear of instant hurt, and being at the time of committing the extortion in his presence. A has, therefore, committed robbery.

Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now