Self Studies

Legal (General Knowledge) Test-1

Result Self Studies

Legal (General Knowledge) Test-1
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0.25

    Which is the oldest Code of Law in India?

    Solution

    The Law Code of Manu, also called "Manusmrti "("manusmrti ") or "Manu Dharma Shastra "("manu-dharma-sastra "), is the oldest Law Code from India.

    • In order to take a new look as to when it was composed, it is useful to examine the clues given to us from the Law Code of Manu itself, from the Rig Veda, from the Indus/Harappan Civilization archaeological remains in northwest India and Pakistan and from the "Time-Dates "of the beginning and end of the Indus/Harappan Civilization.
    • The Code of Manu is a compilation of laws reflecting Hindu thought in the Buddhist period, preserved in a metrical recension, or survey.
    • It contains 2685 verses, and is evidently not the work of one man, but the production of many minds. 

  • Question 2
    1 / -0.25

    Private international law is also called:

    Solution

    • Conflict of laws is a set of rules of procedural law that determine the legal system and the law of jurisdiction applying to a given legal dispute.
    • In civil law, lawyers and legal scholars refer to conflict of laws as private international law. They typically apply when a legal dispute has a “foreign ”element.

  • Question 3
    1 / -0.25

    The right of a party to initiate an action and be heard before a Court of law is called:

    Solution

    • In law, locus standi means the right to bring an action, to be heard in court, or to address the Court on a matter before it.
    • Locus standi is the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party ’s participation in the case.

    Example:  in the United States, a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the plaintiff is (or will be) harmed by the law. Otherwise, the court will rule that the plaintiff “lacks standing ”to bring the suit, and will dismiss the case without considering the merits of the claim of unconstitutionality. In order to sue to have a court declare a law unconstitutional, there must be a valid reason for whoever is suing to be there. The party suing must have something to lose in order to sue unless they have automatic standing by action of law.

  • Question 4
    1 / -0.25

    Indian Parliament is based on the principle of:

    Solution

    • A bicameral legislature divides the legislators into separate assemblies, chambers, or houses.
    • Bicameralism is distinguished from unicameralism, in which all members deliberate and vote as a single group, and from some legislatures that have three or more separate assemblies, chambers, or houses.
    • The Parliament is composed of the President of India and the houses. It is a bicameral legislature with two houses: the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People).

  • Question 5
    1 / -0.25

    The Supreme Court held that evidence can be recorded by video conferencing in the case:

    Solution

    • In a path-breaking development, the Supreme Court held that a trial judge could record evidence of witnesses staying abroad through video conferencing.
    • Interpreting Section 273 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the light of technological advancements, a bench comprising Justice S N Variava and Justice B N Agrawal said recording of evidence through video conferencing would be perfectly legal.
    • The judgment relates to a case in which a US-based doctor had opined against the operation of a cancer patient through video conferencing. Ignoring the advice, two Indian doctors operated on the lady, who later passed away.
    • The patient 's family went to court against the doctors. However, the US-based doctor, Ernest Greenberg, refused to come to India, but expressed willingness to give evidence through video conferencing.
    • But the Bombay high court did not allow the trial court to go ahead citing Section 273, which lays down the procedure for recording evidence.
    • The husband of the deceased, P C Singhi and the Maharashtra government had appealed against the high court order in the Supreme Court.
    • The prosecution has alleged that the two Indian doctors -- Praful B Desai and A K Mukherjee -- did not take good care of the patient after the operation as a result of which she suffered a lot before her death.
    • Speaking for the bench, Justice Variava said, "In cases where the attendance of a witness cannot be procured without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience, the court could consider issuing a commission to record evidence by way of video conferencing."

  • Question 6
    1 / -0.25

    Supreme Court held that Preamble as a basic feature of Constitution cannot be amended in the case of

    Solution

    • In KESAVANANDA BHARTI case the SC held that Preamble does form the basic structure of the Constitution and is of extreme importance.
    • The court further held that since the Preamble is part of the Constitution it can be amended but subject to condition that the 'basic features 'in the Preamble cannot be altered.

  • Question 7
    1 / -0.25

    In the year 2002 the Competition Act was enacted replacing:

    Solution

    Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, 1969 was revoked and replaced by Competition Act, 2002.

    • MRTP Act was enacted to deal with monopolistic, restrictive and unfair trade practices, but due to certain limitations, Competition Act was introduced, which changed the focus from curbing monopolies to promoting competition.

  • Question 8
    1 / -0.25

    Public holidays are declared under:

    Solution

    The holidays are declared under  the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 . They are usually applicable to Government departments more particularly to banks.The bank holiday in India is a public holiday which is declared specially for banks and other financial institutions. Bank holidays are declared by Central /state government under Negotiable Instrument Act.

  • Question 9
    1 / -0.25

    When a person is prosecuted for committing a criminal offense, the burden of proof is on:

    Solution

    • In criminal offense, the burden of proof lies on the prosecution and they have to prove the accused guilty beyond all reasonable doubts
    • In civil wrong, the burden of proof lies upon the plaintiff.

  • Question 10
    1 / -0.25

    The offense that can be compromised between the parties is known as:

    Solution

    • They are those offenses where the complainant and accused can compromise among themselves and the State withdraws the criminal case.
    • This is allowed only for the less serious crimes which entail a punishment of fewer than 2 years.

Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now