Self Studies
Self Studies
Self Studies
Self Studies

Legal (General Knowledge) Test-2

Result Self Studies

Legal (General Knowledge) Test-2
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0.25

    Husband and wife have a right to each other 's company. The right is called:

    Solution

    Conjugal Rights mean Right to stay together.

    • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Section 9) says If either the husband or the wife, without reasonable excuses, withdraws from the society of the other, the aggrieved party may approach the Court for restitution of conjugal rights.
    • Section 9 is to save marriage.
    • The term Conjugal Rights could be placed against any of the spouses guilty of staying away from the other party without a proper reason. If the suit succeeds then the couple would be needed to stay together.
    • The decree of restitution of conjugal rights cannot be actioned by forcefully making the party who has gone away from the society from the other party to live with the one who sets petition for restitution.

     

  • Question 2
    1 / -0.25

    A child born after father 's death is

    Solution

    A person born in these circumstances is called a posthumous child or a posthumously born person. Most instances of posthumous birth involve the birth of a child after the death of its father , but the term is also applied to infants delivered after the death of the mother, usually by caesarean section.

  • Question 3
    1 / -0.25

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the given questions.

    Supreme Court upholds the rights of Travancore royal family in the administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala. The verdict was pronounced on the dispute over management of Thiruvananthapuram 's historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, which is considered one of the richest temples in the country.

    The controversy over the administration and management of the historic temple was pending in the apex court for last nine years in the wake of charges of alleged financial irregularities.

    The sprawling temple, an architectural splendour in granite, was rebuilt in its present form in the 18th century by the Travancore Royal House which had ruled southern Kerala and some adjoining parts of Tamil Nadu before integration of the princely state with the Indian Union in 1947.

    Even after India 's independence, the temple continued to be governed by a trust controlled by the erstwhile royal family for whom Lord Padmanabha (Vishnu) is their family deity.

    A bench of Justices U U Lalit and Indu Malhotra had on April 10 last year reserved its judgement on the pleas challenging the January 31, 2011 verdict of the Kerala High Court in the matter.

    The high court had directed the state government to take steps to set up a body or trust to take control of the temple, its assets and management and to run the temple in accordance with the traditions.

    The apex court had on May 2, 2011 stayed the high court 's direction regarding taking over of the assets and management of the temple.

    The top court had also directed that there shall be a detailed inventory of the articles, valuables, ornaments in Kallaras (vaults).

    When was Supreme Court established?

    Solution

    Supreme Court of India came into existence on 26th January, 1950 and is located on Tilak Marg, New Delhi. Hence, option B is correct.

  • Question 4
    1 / -0.25

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the given questions.

    Supreme Court upholds the rights of Travancore royal family in the administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala. The verdict was pronounced on the dispute over management of Thiruvananthapuram 's historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, which is considered one of the richest temples in the country.

    The controversy over the administration and management of the historic temple was pending in the apex court for last nine years in the wake of charges of alleged financial irregularities.

    The sprawling temple, an architectural splendour in granite, was rebuilt in its present form in the 18th century by the Travancore Royal House which had ruled southern Kerala and some adjoining parts of Tamil Nadu before integration of the princely state with the Indian Union in 1947.

    Even after India 's independence, the temple continued to be governed by a trust controlled by the erstwhile royal family for whom Lord Padmanabha (Vishnu) is their family deity.

    A bench of Justices U U Lalit and Indu Malhotra had on April 10 last year reserved its judgement on the pleas challenging the January 31, 2011 verdict of the Kerala High Court in the matter.

    The high court had directed the state government to take steps to set up a body or trust to take control of the temple, its assets and management and to run the temple in accordance with the traditions.

    The apex court had on May 2, 2011 stayed the high court 's direction regarding taking over of the assets and management of the temple.

    The top court had also directed that there shall be a detailed inventory of the articles, valuables, ornaments in Kallaras (vaults).

    Who is the current CJI of India?

    Solution

    Justice Sanjiv Khanna is the 51st Chief Justice of India.

  • Question 5
    1 / -0.25

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the given questions.

    Supreme Court upholds the rights of Travancore royal family in the administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala. The verdict was pronounced on the dispute over management of Thiruvananthapuram 's historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, which is considered one of the richest temples in the country.

    The controversy over the administration and management of the historic temple was pending in the apex court for last nine years in the wake of charges of alleged financial irregularities.

    The sprawling temple, an architectural splendour in granite, was rebuilt in its present form in the 18th century by the Travancore Royal House which had ruled southern Kerala and some adjoining parts of Tamil Nadu before integration of the princely state with the Indian Union in 1947.

    Even after India 's independence, the temple continued to be governed by a trust controlled by the erstwhile royal family for whom Lord Padmanabha (Vishnu) is their family deity.

    A bench of Justices U U Lalit and Indu Malhotra had on April 10 last year reserved its judgement on the pleas challenging the January 31, 2011 verdict of the Kerala High Court in the matter.

    The high court had directed the state government to take steps to set up a body or trust to take control of the temple, its assets and management and to run the temple in accordance with the traditions.

    The apex court had on May 2, 2011 stayed the high court 's direction regarding taking over of the assets and management of the temple.

    The top court had also directed that there shall be a detailed inventory of the articles, valuables, ornaments in Kallaras (vaults).

    A person who goes underground or evades the jurisdiction of the Court is known as

    Solution

    Absconder  is a person who runs away from legal proceedings/process or avoids arrest.

  • Question 6
    1 / -0.25

     

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the given questions.

    Supreme Court upholds the rights of Travancore royal family in the administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala. The verdict was pronounced on the dispute over management of Thiruvananthapuram 's historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, which is considered one of the richest temples in the country.

    The controversy over the administration and management of the historic temple was pending in the apex court for last nine years in the wake of charges of alleged financial irregularities.

    The sprawling temple, an architectural splendour in granite, was rebuilt in its present form in the 18th century by the Travancore Royal House which had ruled southern Kerala and some adjoining parts of Tamil Nadu before integration of the princely state with the Indian Union in 1947.

    Even after India 's independence, the temple continued to be governed by a trust controlled by the erstwhile royal family for whom Lord Padmanabha (Vishnu) is their family deity.

    A bench of Justices U U Lalit and Indu Malhotra had on April 10 last year reserved its judgement on the pleas challenging the January 31, 2011 verdict of the Kerala High Court in the matter.

    The high court had directed the state government to take steps to set up a body or trust to take control of the temple, its assets and management and to run the temple in accordance with the traditions.

    The apex court had on May 2, 2011 stayed the high court 's direction regarding taking over of the assets and management of the temple.

    The top court had also directed that there shall be a detailed inventory of the articles, valuables, ornaments in Kallaras (vaults).

    Which of the following cases holds the record of the longest hearing in Indian history?

     

    Solution

    The longest proceedings in any case held in the Supreme Court was however witnessed in 1973 during the landmark Keshvanand Bharti case which propounded the theory of basic structure of constitution. The case was heard by the top court for 68 days. Hence, option C is correct.

  • Question 7
    1 / -0.25

    India became the member of United Nations in the Year

    Solution

    Technically, India was a founding member in October 1945, despite it being a British colony.

  • Question 8
    1 / -0.25

     

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the given questions.

    Supreme Court upholds the rights of Travancore royal family in the administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala. The verdict was pronounced on the dispute over management of Thiruvananthapuram 's historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, which is considered one of the richest temples in the country.

    The controversy over the administration and management of the historic temple was pending in the apex court for last nine years in the wake of charges of alleged financial irregularities.

    The sprawling temple, an architectural splendour in granite, was rebuilt in its present form in the 18th century by the Travancore Royal House which had ruled southern Kerala and some adjoining parts of Tamil Nadu before integration of the princely state with the Indian Union in 1947.

    Even after India 's independence, the temple continued to be governed by a trust controlled by the erstwhile royal family for whom Lord Padmanabha (Vishnu) is their family deity.

    A bench of Justices U U Lalit and Indu Malhotra had on April 10 last year reserved its judgement on the pleas challenging the January 31, 2011 verdict of the Kerala High Court in the matter.

    The high court had directed the state government to take steps to set up a body or trust to take control of the temple, its assets and management and to run the temple in accordance with the traditions.

    The apex court had on May 2, 2011 stayed the high court 's direction regarding taking over of the assets and management of the temple.

    The top court had also directed that there shall be a detailed inventory of the articles, valuables, ornaments in Kallaras (vaults).

    CJI is appointed under which article of the Indian Constitution?

     

    Solution

    The Chief Justice of India and the Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President under clause (2) of Article 124 of the Constitution.
    Hence, option A is correct.

  • Question 9
    1 / -0.25

    A party to the suit is called

    Solution

    A party to the suit is called a litigant.

    In a legal context, a "party "refers to an individual or entity involved in a lawsuit or legal proceeding. There are two main types of parties in a lawsuit: the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff is the person or entity who brings the suit, while the defendant is the person or entity being sued.

    A litigant, therefore, refers to any party involved in the lawsuit, whether they are the plaintiff or the defendant. Litigants are responsible for presenting their case, either by themselves or through legal representation, and for complying with the rules and procedures of the court.

    In some cases, there may be multiple plaintiffs or defendants involved in a single lawsuit. These individuals or entities are referred to as co-plaintiffs and co-defendants, but they are still considered litigants, as they are parties to the suit.

    In summary, a litigant is a general term for any party involved in a lawsuit, whether they are the ones initiating the legal action or defending against it.

  • Question 10
    1 / -0.25

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the given questions.

    Supreme Court upholds the rights of Travancore royal family in the administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala. The verdict was pronounced on the dispute over management of Thiruvananthapuram 's historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, which is considered one of the richest temples in the country.

    The controversy over the administration and management of the historic temple was pending in the apex court for last nine years in the wake of charges of alleged financial irregularities.

    The sprawling temple, an architectural splendour in granite, was rebuilt in its present form in the 18th century by the Travancore Royal House which had ruled southern Kerala and some adjoining parts of Tamil Nadu before integration of the princely state with the Indian Union in 1947.

    Even after India 's independence, the temple continued to be governed by a trust controlled by the erstwhile royal family for whom Lord Padmanabha (Vishnu) is their family deity.

    A bench of Justices U U Lalit and Indu Malhotra had on April 10 last year reserved its judgement on the pleas challenging the January 31, 2011 verdict of the Kerala High Court in the matter.

    The high court had directed the state government to take steps to set up a body or trust to take control of the temple, its assets and management and to run the temple in accordance with the traditions.

    The apex court had on May 2, 2011 stayed the high court 's direction regarding taking over of the assets and management of the temple.

    The top court had also directed that there shall be a detailed inventory of the articles, valuables, ornaments in Kallaras (vaults).

    Where is the famous Konark Sun Temple located?

    Solution

    The Konark Sun Temple is located in an eponymous village (now NAC Area) about 35 kilometres (22 mi) northeast of Puri and 65 kilometres (40 mi) southeast of Bhubaneswar on the Bay of Bengal coastline in the Indian state of Odisha. Hence, option D is correct.

  • Question 11
    1 / -0.25

    No one can be convicted twice for the same offence. This doctrine is called

    Solution

    Double jeopardy , non bis in idem or ne bis in idem is a procedural defense that prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a valid acquittal or conviction.

  • Question 12
    1 / -0.25

    A participant in commission of crime is popularly known as:

    Solution

    A person who knowingly, voluntarily or intentionally gives assistance to another in the commission of crime. An accomplice is criminally liable to the same extent as the principal.

  • Question 13
    1 / -0.25

    Which of the following is not payable to Central Government?

    Solution

    Land is a matter on which only State Governments  can govern, thus the Stamp duties on transfer of immovable properties are levied by State Governments.

  • Question 14
    1 / -0.25

    Where is the National Judicial Academy located?

    Solution

     

    • The institute was registered on 17 August 1993 under the societies  registration act of 1860. 
    • N.R Madhava Menon  was its founding director.
    • Its 63-acre campus is located on the outskirts of Bhopal. It also has a registered office in  Delhi.
    • The  president of India  inaugurated the institute building on September 5, 2002.

     

  • Question 15
    1 / -0.25

    Who has the constitutional right to audience in all Indian Courts?

    Solution

    Attorney General has the right of audience in all Courts in India as well as the right to participate in the proceedings of the Parliament, though not to vote.

Self Studies
User
Question Analysis

  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now