Self Studies

Topics of Law Test 60

Result Self Studies

Topics of Law Test 60
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    [passage-header]Read the following passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives given.[/passage-header]Legislation is the prime source of law and consists in the declaration of legal rules by a competent authority. A parliamentary legislature frames new laws, such as Acts of Parliament, and amends or repeals old laws. Legislature may delegate lawmaking powers to lower bodies. Delegated legislation may be open to challenge for irregularity of process; and the legislature usually has the right to withdraw delegated powers if it sees fit. Most legislatures have their powers restricted by the nation's Constitution, and Montesquieu's theory of the separation of powers typically restricts a legislature's powers to legislation. Although the legislature has the power to legislate/ it is the courts who have the power to interpret statutes. Similarly, although parliaments have the power to legislate, it is usually the executive who decides on the legislative programme. Judicial precedent is based on the doctrine of stare decisis, and mostly associated with jurisdictions based on the English Common Law, but the concept has been adopted in part by Civil Law systems. Precedent is the accumulated principles of law derived from centuries of decisions. Judgments passed by judges in important cases are recorded and become significant source of law. A judicial precedent is a judgment or decision of a court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar state of fact in the same manner or on the same principle or by analogy. Equity is the case law developed by the Court of Chancery which is now defunct. Equity prevails over common law, but its application is discretionary. Equity's main achievements are: trusts, charities, probate, and equitable remedies. The Judicature Reforms in the 1870s effected a procedural fusion of the two bodies of law, ending their institutional separation. The reforms did not effect any substantive fusion, however. Judicial or academic reasoning which assumes the contrary has been described as a "fusion fallacy". A custom as a law is not written, but is a rule whereby if a practice can be shown to have existed for a very long time, such as "since time immemorial", it becomes a source of law.

    ...view full instructions

    Judicial precedent is associated mainly with jurisdictions based on ______________.
  • Question 2
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    [passage-header]Read the following passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives given.[/passage-header]Legislation is the prime source of law and consists in the declaration of legal rules by a competent authority. A parliamentary legislature frames new laws, such as Acts of Parliament, and amends or repeals old laws. Legislature may delegate lawmaking powers to lower bodies. Delegated legislation may be open to challenge for irregularity of process; and the legislature usually has the right to withdraw delegated powers if it sees fit. Most legislatures have their powers restricted by the nation's Constitution, and Montesquieu's theory of the separation of powers typically restricts a legislature's powers to legislation. Although the legislature has the power to legislate/ it is the courts who have the power to interpret statutes. Similarly, although parliaments have the power to legislate, it is usually the executive who decides on the legislative programme. Judicial precedent is based on the doctrine of stare decisis, and mostly associated with jurisdictions based on the English Common Law, but the concept has been adopted in part by Civil Law systems. Precedent is the accumulated principles of law derived from centuries of decisions. Judgments passed by judges in important cases are recorded and become significant source of law. A judicial precedent is a judgment or decision of a court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar state of fact in the same manner or on the same principle or by analogy. Equity is the case law developed by the Court of Chancery which is now defunct. Equity prevails over common law, but its application is discretionary. Equity's main achievements are: trusts, charities, probate, and equitable remedies. The Judicature Reforms in the 1870s effected a procedural fusion of the two bodies of law, ending their institutional separation. The reforms did not effect any substantive fusion, however. Judicial or academic reasoning which assumes the contrary has been described as a "fusion fallacy". A custom as a law is not written, but is a rule whereby if a practice can be shown to have existed for a very long time, such as "since time immemorial", it becomes a source of law.

    ...view full instructions

    The doctrine of stare decisis is associated with ______.
  • Question 3
    1 / -0
    LEGAL PRINCIPLE: Whoever intentionally uses force to any person, without that person's consent, in order to committing of any offence, or intending by the use of such force to cause, or knowing it likely to cause injury, fear, or annoyance to the person to whom the force is used, is said to use criminal force to that other.
    FACTUAL SITUATION: Akash was burning some crackers in his house when his dog got scared and got unruly which scared his brother Mohsin. Can this be called criminal force?
    DECISION will be _____.
    Solution
    The legal principle in the very second word says that the act must be done intentionally. Thus, making it the very essence of the principle.
    Akash had no intention to scare or cause injury, fear or annoyance to Mohsin. Neither could he have reasonably foreseen that his actions will scare Mohsin.
    Therefore, Akash is not liable for any offence as he had no mala fide intention.
  • Question 4
    1 / -0
    Express contract is made by __________________.
  • Question 5
    1 / -0
    LEGAL PRINCIPLES:
    (1) To constitute a punishable criminal offence, guilty intention must accompany an illegal act.
    (2) Criminal mischief means causing damage in public property intentionally or with the knowledge that harm may occur.
    FACTUAL SITUATION: Neel being a Sharukh Khan fan went for the premier of the movie, Happy New Year. As usual, he carried his pen-knife, a gift from his dead mother. At the security check, impatient of waiting in the queue, Neel slunk past the guards and the metal detector when no one was watching. Later, he was apprehended in the hall and was charged for mischief and possession of a weapon when it was expressly forbidden.
    DECISION will be ______.
  • Question 6
    1 / -0
    LEGAL PRINCIPLES: It is settled that ignorance of law is no excuse but ignorance of fact may be excused.

    FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a foreign national was carrying child pornographic material with him and was apprehended when he reached India. It is an offence to possess child pornographic material in India. X did not know this law.

    QUESTION: Can X be prosecuted in India?
    Solution
    Ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat which means ignorance of the law excuses not and ignorance of law excuses no one in latin, respectively. It is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because one was unaware of its content.
    Hence, X can be prosecuted because ignorance of law is not excusable.
  • Question 7
    1 / -0
    LEGAL PRINCIPLE: To be held guilty of an offence, one should have done the act that causes the intended unit.
    FACTUAL SITUATION: A, with the intention to murder B, stabs him repeatedly with a knife. B is taken to the hospital and is found to be out of danger. Thereafter, due to the doctor's negligence, B's wounds are infected and he requires surgical intervention. During the time of operation to remove his infected leg, B died on account of administration of general anaesthesia.
    DECISION will be _____.
    Solution
    Even though the intention of A was to kill B he must be held guilty only of the act that causes the intended unit. 
    Now his intended unit was to murder B but his act did not cause the intended unit. Therefore, by applying the Principle to the facts he cannot be held liable of causing Murder. 
    Since, B did not die because of A's acts but because of the negligence of Doctor.
    Hence, A may be guilty of attempt of murder and not of murder.
  • Question 8
    1 / -0
    One person can contract with himself or with himself and others jointly. Is this true?
  • Question 9
    1 / -0
    Choose the correct answers from the following alternatives given
    Cross offers by two parties to each other:
    Solution
    An offer must be communicated to the offeree An offer must be communicated to the person to whom the same is addressed. ... 'Cross-offers' do not constitute acceptance of one's offer by the other and as such there is no completed agreement.
  • Question 10
    1 / -0
    A prospectus issued by a company for subscription of its shares and debentures is _______________.
Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now