Self Studies
Selfstudy
Selfstudy

Reading Compreh...

TIME LEFT -
  • Question 1
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    I reported on the Iraq invasion as a "unilateral" journalist, which meant I rented an SUV from Hertz in Kuwait and sneaked across the border with the first US tanks, I wound up in Baghdad on April 9, 2003, and watched the Marines tear down the iconic statue of Saddam Hussein at Firdos Square. I returned to Iraq on several occasions to work on length stories about the dismal turn of events as the occupation turned into a war of Americans against Iraqis, and Iraqis against Iraqis. The carriage, though heartbreaking, was almost the least shocking experience of my journeys between the war in the Mideast and my home in New York City. While Americans killed and got killed in Iraq, Americans back home shopped at Walmart and watched reality television. I had covered a lot of wars and thought I had grown accustomed to peaceful countries being unconcerned by other people's quarrels. My unsentimental education had begun in the 1990s in Bosnia where I often had a Matrix-like experience. In the morning, I would wake up in Sarajevo or another cursed town that was blasted by bombs, frozen by winter and deprived of food. I would then begin my efforts to get out of the hell. I would hope for a seat on what was known as Maybe Airlines. These were the UN relief flights that brought food into besieged Sarajevo. Maybe the shelling would be light enough for flights to land and take off, maybe not. If the flights were grounded, I could try to escape by driving along Sniper Alley and through a creepy no man's land that constituted the only border that mattered in a nation cut and quartered by war. Distance is small in Europe. By the afternoon, I could be in Vienna or Budapest or London, enjoying the comfortable life that Europe offered many of its citizens: hot showers, good food, clean sheets, the certainty that I would not be killed by a mortar as I slept. I had a hard time believing these altered states existed in such close proximity. The contented Europeans eating apple strudel or shopping at Harrods on those 1990s afternoons- didn't they realize the war was being fought in their backyard? The answer was that they knew and didn't care. Proximity isn't density. Bosnia though close wasn't their home. Other people were killing and dying, not their people. I had understood only half of it and learned the other half a decade later, on my return to America after sojourns in Iraq. Outside the tight-knit community of military families who cared deeply about the wars, nearly everyone in America went about his or her life as though Iraq and Afghanistan didn't matter much. Nor had Americans been asked to change their way of life. It had become possible, I realized, for a nation to be at war without suffering the inconveniences associated with war- including the inconvenience of thinking about it. World War II was a classic war in the sense of rationing, of derives for war bonds, of a draft the elite could not avoid the college deferments and of a ceaseless drumbeat in almost every sector of society that a great conflict as being fought that required great sacrifices if everyone. Even for families spared the loss of a loved one overseas. World War II was a visible - intentionally visible - aspect of life in the homeland; the nation's leaders made it do. Life as it was before the war had to be suspended.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following best states the author's main point? 

  • Question 2
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    In the first scene of "Hitchcock Loves Bikinis," a young mum is playing happily with her baby. Next comes a close-up shot of Alfred Hitchcock, the late movie director, smiling. Clearly, he is a man whose heart is warmed by this sweet glove. In the glimpse of maternal love. In the next scene, we see a bikini-clad woman sunbathing followed by exactly the same shot of Hitchcock smiling. Instead of a benign grandfatherly figure, this time we see a lecherous old man. The moral of the story is simple: context is everything. Mr. Kagan's effort, "Psychology's Ghosts," consists of his assessment of four problems is psychological theory and clinically practical. The first problem is laid out in the chapter "Missing Contexts". the facts that many researchers fail to consider that their measurements of brains, behavior and self-reported experience are profoundly influenced by their subjects' culture, class, and experiences, as well as by the situation in which the research is conducted. In his second essay, "Happiness Ascendant", Mr. Kagan virtually demolishes the popular academic effort to measure "subjective well-being", let alone a measure and compare the level of happiness of entries nations. No psychologist, he observes would accept as reliable your own answer to the question: "How good is your memory?" Whether your answer is "great" or "terrible", you have no way of knowing whether your memory of your memories is accurate. But psychologists, Mr. Kagan argues, are willing to accept people's answer to how happy they are as if it "is an accurate measure of a psychological state whose definition remains fuzzy." In the third and fourth essays, "Who is Mentally Ill?" "Helping the Mentally III", Mr. Kagan turns to the intransigent problems of psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM) "regard every intense bout of sadness or worry, no matter what their origin is as a possible sign of mental disorder," Mr. Kagan laments. But "most of these illness categories are analogous to complaints of headaches or cramps. Physicians can decide on the best treatment for a headache only after they have determined its cause. The symptom alone is an insufficient guide". Nonetheless, the DSM is primarily a collection of symptoms, overlooking the context in which the symptom such as anxiety or law sexual desire occurs and what it means to an individual. It might mean nothing at all. What it means to an American might mean nothing to a Japanese. The same one-size-fits-all approach plagues treatment, "Most drugs can be linked to a blow on the head, "Mr. Kagan observes, they are blunt instruments, not precisely-tailored remedies. Psychotherapy depends largely on the clients' belief that it will be helpful, which is why all therapies help some people and some people are not helped by any. No experience affect anyone equally- including natural disasters, abuse, having a cruel parent, losing a job or having an illicit affair - through many therapists wish us to believe the opposite.

    ...view full instructions

    The first paragraph performs which of the following functions in the passage?

  • Question 3
    1 / -0

    SCENE I. Court of Macbeth's castle.

    Enter BANQUO, and FLEANCE bearing a torch before him

    BANQUO

    How goes the night, boy?

    FLEANCE

    The moon is down; I have not heard the clock.

    What does the line 'Enter Banquo and Fleance bearing a torch before him' indicate?

     

  • Question 4
    1 / -0

    SCENE IV. Forres. The palace.

    Flourish. Enter DUNCAN, MALCOLM, DONALBAIN, LENNOX, and Attendants

    DUNCAN

    Is execution done on Cawdor? Are not
    Those in commission yet return'd?

    MALCOLM

    My liege,
    They are not yet come back. But I have spoke
    With one that saw him die: who did report
    That very frankly he confess'd his treasons,
    Implored your highness' pardon and set forth
    A deep repentance: nothing in his life
    Became him like the leaving it; he died
    As one that had been studied in his death
    To throw away the dearest thing he owed,
    As 'twere a careless trifle.

    What does the line 'Enter Malcom, Duncan, Donalbin, Lennox and Attendants' indicate?

     

  • Question 5
    1 / -0

    BANQUO

    Thanks, sir: the like to you!

    Exeunt BANQUO and FLEANCE

    MACBETH

    Go bid thy mistress, when my drink is ready,
    She strike upon the bell. Get thee to bed.

    What does the line 'Exeunt Banquo and Fleance' indicate?

     

  • Question 6
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    In the first scene of "Hitchcock Loves Bikinis," a young mum is playing happily with her baby. Next comes a close-up shot of Alfred Hitchcock, the late movie director, smiling. Clearly, he is a man whose heart is warmed by this sweet glove. In the glimpse of maternal love. In the next scene, we see a bikini-clad woman sunbathing followed by exactly the same shot of Hitchcock smiling. Instead of a benign grandfatherly figure, this time we see a lecherous old man. The moral of the story is simple: context is everything. Mr. Kagan's effort, "Psychology's Ghosts," consists of his assessment of four problems is psychological theory and clinically practical. The first problem is laid out in the chapter "Missing Contexts". the facts that many researchers fail to consider that their measurements of brains, behavior and self-reported experience are profoundly influenced by their subjects' culture, class, and experiences, as well as by the situation in which the research is conducted. In his second essay, "Happiness Ascendant", Mr. Kagan virtually demolishes the popular academic effort to measure "subjective well-being", let alone a measure and compare the level of happiness of entries nations. No psychologist, he observes would accept as reliable your own answer to the question: "How good is your memory?" Whether your answer is "great" or "terrible", you have no way of knowing whether your memory of your memories is accurate. But psychologists, Mr. Kagan argues, are willing to accept people's answer to how happy they are as if it "is an accurate measure of a psychological state whose definition remains fuzzy." In the third and fourth essays, "Who is Mentally Ill?" "Helping the Mentally III", Mr. Kagan turns to the intransigent problems of psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM) "regard every intense bout of sadness or worry, no matter what their origin is as a possible sign of mental disorder," Mr. Kagan laments. But "most of these illness categories are analogous to complaints of headaches or cramps. Physicians can decide on the best treatment for a headache only after they have determined its cause. The symptom alone is an insufficient guide". Nonetheless, the DSM is primarily a collection of symptoms, overlooking the context in which the symptom such as anxiety or law sexual desire occurs and what it means to an individual. It might mean nothing at all. What it means to an American might mean nothing to a Japanese. The same one-size-fits-all approach plagues treatment, "Most drugs can be linked to a blow on the head, "Mr. Kagan observes, they are blunt instruments, not precisely-tailored remedies. Psychotherapy depends largely on the clients' belief that it will be helpful, which is why all therapies help some people and some people are not helped by any. No experience affect anyone equally- including natural disasters, abuse, having a cruel parent, losing a job or having an illicit affair - through many therapists wish us to believe the opposite.

    ...view full instructions

    It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which  of the following about psychiatric treatment?

  • Question 7
    1 / -0

    SCENE V. Inverness. Macbeth's castle.

    Enter LADY MACBETH, reading a letter

    LADY MACBETH

    'They met me in the day of success: and I have
    learned by the perfectest report, they have more in
    them than mortal knowledge. When I burned in desire
    to question them further, they made themselves air,
    into which they vanished. Whiles I stood rapt in
    the wonder of it, came missives from the king, who
    all-hailed me 'Thane of Cawdor;' by which title,
    before, these weird sisters saluted me, and referred
    me to the coming on of time, with 'Hail, king that
    shalt be!' This have I thought good to deliver
    thee, my dearest partner of greatness, that thou
    mightst not lose the dues of rejoicing, by being
    ignorant of what greatness is promised thee. Lay it
    to thy heart, and farewell.'
    Glamis thou art, and Cawdor; and shalt be
    What thou art promised: yet do I fear thy nature;
    It is too full o' the milk of human kindness
    To catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great;
    Art not without ambition, but without
    The illness should attend it: what thou wouldst highly,
    That wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false,
    And yet wouldst wrongly win: thou'ldst have, great Glamis,
    That which cries 'Thus thou must do, if thou have it;
    And that which rather thou dost fear to do
    Than wishest should be undone.' Hie thee hither,
    That I may pour my spirits in thine ear;
    And chastise with the valour of my tongue
    All that impedes thee from the golden round,
    Which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem
    To have thee crown'd withal.

    What does the line 'Enter Lady Macbeth, reading a letter' mean?

     

  • Question 8
    1 / -0

    SCENE VII. Macbeth's castle.

    Hautboys and torches. Enter a Sewer, and divers Servants with dishes and service, and pass over the stage. Then enter MACBETH

    MACBETH

    If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well
    It were done quickly: if the assassination
    Could trammel up the consequence, and catch
    With his surcease success; that but this blow
    Might be the be-all and the end-all here,
    But here, upon this bank and shoal of time,
    We'ld jump the life to come. But in these cases
    We still have judgment here; that we but teach
    Bloody instructions, which, being taught, return
    To plague the inventor: this even-handed justice
    Commends the ingredients of our poison'd chalice
    To our own lips. 

    What does the line 'Enter a Sewer, and divers Servants with dishes and service, and pass over the stage. Then enter MACBETH' indicate?

     

  • Question 9
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    I reported on the Iraq invasion as a "unilateral" journalist, which meant I rented an SUV from Hertz in Kuwait and sneaked across the border with the first US tanks, I wound up in Baghdad on April 9, 2003, and watched the Marines tear down the iconic statue of Saddam Hussein at Firdos Square. I returned to Iraq on several occasions to work on length stories about the dismal turn of events as the occupation turned into a war of Americans against Iraqis, and Iraqis against Iraqis. The carriage, though heartbreaking, was almost the least shocking experience of my journeys between the war in the Mideast and my home in New York City. While Americans killed and got killed in Iraq, Americans back home shopped at Walmart and watched reality television. I had covered a lot of wars and thought I had grown accustomed to peaceful countries being unconcerned by other people's quarrels. My unsentimental education had begun in the 1990s in Bosnia where I often had a Matrix-like experience. In the morning, I would wake up in Sarajevo or another cursed town that was blasted by bombs, frozen by winter and deprived of food. I would then begin my efforts to get out of the hell. I would hope for a seat on what was known as Maybe Airlines. These were the UN relief flights that brought food into besieged Sarajevo. Maybe the shelling would be light enough for flights to land and take off, maybe not. If the flights were grounded, I could try to escape by driving along Sniper Alley and through a creepy no man's land that constituted the only border that mattered in a nation cut and quartered by war. Distance is small in Europe. By the afternoon, I could be in Vienna or Budapest or London, enjoying the comfortable life that Europe offered many of its citizens: hot showers, good food, clean sheets, the certainty that I would not be killed by a mortar as I slept. I had a hard time believing these altered states existed in such close proximity. The contented Europeans eating apple strudel or shopping at Harrods on those 1990s afternoons- didn't they realize the war was being fought in their backyard? The answer was that they knew and didn't care. Proximity isn't density. Bosnia though close wasn't their home. Other people were killing and dying, not their people. I had understood only half of it and learned the other half a decade later, on my return to America after sojourns in Iraq. Outside the tight-knit community of military families who cared deeply about the wars, nearly everyone in America went about his or her life as though Iraq and Afghanistan didn't matter much. Nor had Americans been asked to change their way of life. It had become possible, I realized, for a nation to be at war without suffering the inconveniences associated with war- including the inconvenience of thinking about it. World War II was a classic war in the sense of rationing, of derives for war bonds, of a draft the elite could not avoid the college deferments and of a ceaseless drumbeat in almost every sector of society that a great conflict as being fought that required great sacrifices if everyone. Even for families spared the loss of a loved one overseas. World War II was a visible - intentionally visible - aspect of life in the homeland; the nation's leaders made it do. Life as it was before the war had to be suspended.

    ...view full instructions

    The phrase 'unsentimental education' is used to 

  • Question 10
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    $$1$$. Often, we passionately pursue matters that in the future appear to be contradictory to our real intention or nature; and triumph is followed by remorse or regret. There are numerous examples of such a trend in the annals of history and contemporary life.
    $$2$$. Alfred Nobel was the son of Immanuel Nobel, an inventor who experimented extensively with explosives. Alfred too carried out research and experiments with a large range of chemicals; he found new methods to blast rocks for the construction of roads and bridges; he was engaged in the development of technology and different weapons; his life revolved around rockets and cannons and gun powder. The ingenuity of the scientist brought him enough wealth to buy the Bofors armament plant in Sweden.
    $$3$$. Paradoxically, Nobel's life was a busy one yet he was lonely; and as he grew older, he began suffering from guilt of having invented the dynamite that was being used for destructive purposes. He set aside a huge part of his wealth to institute Nobel Prizes. Besides honouring men and women for their extraordinary achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine and literature, he wished to honour people who worked for the promotion of peace.
    $$4$$. It's strange that the very man whose name was closely connected with explosives and inventions that helped in waging wars willed a large part of his earnings for the people who work for the promotion of peace and the benefit of mankind. The Nobel Peace Prize is intended for a person who has accomplished the best work for fraternity among nations, for abolition or reduction of war and for promotion of peace.
    $$5$$. Another example that comes to one's mind is that of Albert Einstein. In $$1939$$, fearing that the Nazis would win the race to build the world's first atomic bomb, Einstein urged President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch an American programme on nuclear research. The matter was considered and a project called the Manhattan Project was initiated. The project involved intense nuclear research for the construction of the world's first atomic bomb. All this while, Einstein had the impression that the bomb would be used to protect the world from the Nazis. But in $$1945$$, when Hiroshima was bombed to end World War II, Einstein was deeply grieved and he regretted his endorsement of the need for nuclear research.
    $$6$$. He also stated that had he known that the Germans would be unsuccessful in making the atomic bomb, he would have probably never recommended making one. In $$1947$$, Einstein began working for the cause of disarmament. But, Einstein's name still continues to be linked with the bomb. Man's fluctuating thoughts, changing opinions, varying opportunities keep the mind in a state of flux. Hence, the paradox of life: it's certain that nothing is certain in life.

    ...view full instructions

    Read the given passage carefully and answer the question:
    Alfred established the Nobel Prizes to _______________________.

Submit Test
Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Answered - 0

  • Unanswered - 10

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Submit Test
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now