Starting Point: Start with placing F and J as, F sits opposite to the one who sits 2nd to the left of J which means both J and F are not sitting in the same row.
E and J are immediate neighbors. J faces south. F works in HP and sits at one of the extreme ends. A sits opposite to F.
So, E either sits to the right or left of J. So, we have 2 cases.
Case I: When E sits to the left of J in row 1:
|
Row - 1
|
|
|
J |
E |
A |
| Row - 2 |
|
|
|
|
F(HP) |
Case II: When E sits to the right of J in row 1:
| Row - 1 |
|
E |
J |
|
A |
| Row - 2 |
|
|
|
|
F(HP) |
E sits opposite to the one who sits second to the right of the one who works in Tata. H works in HCL. Only one person sits between the one who works in Tata and the one who works in HCL. B works in Wipro and sits third to the right of the one who works in Infosys. B sits opposite to C. C sits to the immediate right of the one who works in IBM.
So, case II is rejected because E sits opposite to the one who sits 2nd to the right of the one works in Tata which is not possible in case II. Also, A must be working in Infosys so, that C sits immediate right of the one who works in IBM.
| Row - 1 |
|
B(Wipro) |
J |
E |
A(Infosys) |
| Row - 2 |
(IBM) |
C(Tata) |
|
H(HCL) |
F(HP) |
The one who works in LG sits opposite to G, who works in TCS. I does not work in Nokia. I does not work in IBM.
So, J must be working in LG so, that G sits opposite to the one who works in LG. Also, E works in Nokia and I works in Samsung.
The final arrangement is as follows:
| Row - 1 |
I(samsung) |
B(wipro) |
J(LG) |
E(Nokia) |
A(Infosys) |
| Row - 2 |
D(IBM) |
C(Tata) |
g(TCS) |
H(HCL) |
F(HP) |
All are sitting at the extreme ends of the row except C.