Self Studies

Language Comprehension Test - 4

Result Self Studies

Language Comprehension Test - 4
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the questions.

    The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987

    Punishment for Abetment of Sati (See 4):

    (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 , if any person commits sati, whoever abets the commission of such sati, either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    (2) If any person attempts to commit sati, whoever abets such attempt either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    The following act shall also be deemed to be an abetment for the purpose of this Section:

    (a) any inducement to a widow or woman to get her burnt or buried alive along with the body of her deceased husband or with any other relative or with any article, object or thing associated with the husband or with such relative, irrespective of whether she is in a fit state of mind or is labouring under a state of intoxication or stupefaction or other cause impeding the exercise of her free will;

    (b) making a widow or woman believe that the commission of sati would result in some spiritual benefit to her deceased husband or relative or the general well-being of the family;

    (c) encouraging a widow or a woman to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati and thus instigating her to commit sati;

    (d) participating in any procession in connection with the commission of sati or aiding the widow or woman in her decision to commit sati by taking her along with the body of her deceased husband or relative to the cremation or burial ground;

    (e) being present at the place where sati committed as an active participant to such commission or to any ceremony connected with it;

    (f) preventing or obstructing the widow or woman from saving herself from being burnt or buried alive;

    (g) obstructing or interfering with, the Police in the discharge of its duties of taking any steps to prevent the commission of sati.

    Punishment for glorification of Sati (Sec. 5):

    As per Section 2(b) of the Act, glorification in relation to sati; whether such sati was committed before or after the commencement of this Act, includes, among other things:

    (i) the observance of any ceremony or the taking out of a procession in connection with the commission of sati; or

    (ii) supporting, justifying or propagating the practice of sati in any manner; or

    (iii) arranging of any function to eulogize the person who has committed sati; or

    (iv) creation of a trust, or the collection of funds, or the construction of a temple or other structure or the carrying on of any form of worship or the performance of any ceremony there with a view to perpetuate the honour of, or to preserve the memory of a person who has committed sati.

    ...view full instructions

    Under which Act, a person who abets, either directiy or indirectly to contmit sati, will be punished?

    Solution

    Let us read the point (2) in the given passage that says:

    If any person attempts to commit sati, whoever abets such attempt either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    This point falls under "The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987".

  • Question 2
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the questions.

    The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987

    Punishment for Abetment of Sati (See 4):

    (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 , if any person commits sati, whoever abets the commission of such sati, either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    (2) If any person attempts to commit sati, whoever abets such attempt either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    The following act shall also be deemed to be an abetment for the purpose of this Section:

    (a) any inducement to a widow or woman to get her burnt or buried alive along with the body of her deceased husband or with any other relative or with any article, object or thing associated with the husband or with such relative, irrespective of whether she is in a fit state of mind or is labouring under a state of intoxication or stupefaction or other cause impeding the exercise of her free will;

    (b) making a widow or woman believe that the commission of sati would result in some spiritual benefit to her deceased husband or relative or the general well-being of the family;

    (c) encouraging a widow or a woman to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati and thus instigating her to commit sati;

    (d) participating in any procession in connection with the commission of sati or aiding the widow or woman in her decision to commit sati by taking her along with the body of her deceased husband or relative to the cremation or burial ground;

    (e) being present at the place where sati committed as an active participant to such commission or to any ceremony connected with it;

    (f) preventing or obstructing the widow or woman from saving herself from being burnt or buried alive;

    (g) obstructing or interfering with, the Police in the discharge of its duties of taking any steps to prevent the commission of sati.

    Punishment for glorification of Sati (Sec. 5):

    As per Section 2(b) of the Act, glorification in relation to sati; whether such sati was committed before or after the commencement of this Act, includes, among other things:

    (i) the observance of any ceremony or the taking out of a procession in connection with the commission of sati; or

    (ii) supporting, justifying or propagating the practice of sati in any manner; or

    (iii) arranging of any function to eulogize the person who has committed sati; or

    (iv) creation of a trust, or the collection of funds, or the construction of a temple or other structure or the carrying on of any form of worship or the performance of any ceremony there with a view to perpetuate the honour of, or to preserve the memory of a person who has committed sati.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following acts are punishable under the provisions of "The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987?

    a. Instigating a widow to commit sati

    b. Aiding the widow in her decision to commit sati

    c. Participating in any procession in connection of sati.

    d. Preventing the widow from saving herself from being burnt alive.

    Solution

    Let us read the acts that are deemed to be punishable under Sati Prevention Act:

    Point (c) includes,encouraging a widow or a woman to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati and thus instigating her to commit sati.

    Point (d) includes,participating in any procession in connection with the commission of sati or aiding the widow or woman in her decision to commit sati by taking her along with the body of her deceased husband or relative to the cremation or burial ground.

    Thus, from above, we see that, instigating a widow to commit sati, aiding the widow in her decision to commit sati and participating in any procession in connection of sati are acts thatare punishable under the provisions of "The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987.

    Hence, the correct option is (D)

  • Question 3
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the questions.

    The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987

    Punishment for Abetment of Sati (See 4):

    (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 , if any person commits sati, whoever abets the commission of such sati, either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    (2) If any person attempts to commit sati, whoever abets such attempt either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    The following act shall also be deemed to be an abetment for the purpose of this Section:

    (a) any inducement to a widow or woman to get her burnt or buried alive along with the body of her deceased husband or with any other relative or with any article, object or thing associated with the husband or with such relative, irrespective of whether she is in a fit state of mind or is labouring under a state of intoxication or stupefaction or other cause impeding the exercise of her free will;

    (b) making a widow or woman believe that the commission of sati would result in some spiritual benefit to her deceased husband or relative or the general well-being of the family;

    (c) encouraging a widow or a woman to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati and thus instigating her to commit sati;

    (d) participating in any procession in connection with the commission of sati or aiding the widow or woman in her decision to commit sati by taking her along with the body of her deceased husband or relative to the cremation or burial ground;

    (e) being present at the place where sati committed as an active participant to such commission or to any ceremony connected with it;

    (f) preventing or obstructing the widow or woman from saving herself from being burnt or buried alive;

    (g) obstructing or interfering with, the Police in the discharge of its duties of taking any steps to prevent the commission of sati.

    Punishment for glorification of Sati (Sec. 5):

    As per Section 2(b) of the Act, glorification in relation to sati; whether such sati was committed before or after the commencement of this Act, includes, among other things:

    (i) the observance of any ceremony or the taking out of a procession in connection with the commission of sati; or

    (ii) supporting, justifying or propagating the practice of sati in any manner; or

    (iii) arranging of any function to eulogize the person who has committed sati; or

    (iv) creation of a trust, or the collection of funds, or the construction of a temple or other structure or the carrying on of any form of worship or the performance of any ceremony there with a view to perpetuate the honour of, or to preserve the memory of a person who has committed sati.

    ...view full instructions

    Under the provisions of The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, which of the following acts shall be deemed to be an abetment of sati?

    a. obstructing the Police, taking any steps to prevent the commission of sati.

    b. being present at the place where sati is committed as an active participant.

    c. making a widow believe that her commission of sati will give spiritual benefit to her deceased husband.

    d. encouraging a widow to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati.

    Solution

    Let us see the following points given in the passage that are deemed to be an abetment of Sati:

    (b) making a widow or woman believe that the commission of sati would result in some spiritual benefit to her deceased husband or relative or the general well-being of the family;

    (c) encouraging a widow or a woman to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati and thus instigating her to commit sati;

    (e) being present at the place where sati committed as an active participant to such commission or to any ceremony connected with it;

    (g) obstructing or interfering with, the Police in the discharge of its duties of taking any steps to prevent the commission of sati.

    Thus, we find all the acts mentioned in a, b, c and d are correct.

  • Question 4
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the questions.

    The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987

    Punishment for Abetment of Sati (See 4):

    (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 , if any person commits sati, whoever abets the commission of such sati, either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    (2) If any person attempts to commit sati, whoever abets such attempt either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    The following act shall also be deemed to be an abetment for the purpose of this Section:

    (a) any inducement to a widow or woman to get her burnt or buried alive along with the body of her deceased husband or with any other relative or with any article, object or thing associated with the husband or with such relative, irrespective of whether she is in a fit state of mind or is labouring under a state of intoxication or stupefaction or other cause impeding the exercise of her free will;

    (b) making a widow or woman believe that the commission of sati would result in some spiritual benefit to her deceased husband or relative or the general well-being of the family;

    (c) encouraging a widow or a woman to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati and thus instigating her to commit sati;

    (d) participating in any procession in connection with the commission of sati or aiding the widow or woman in her decision to commit sati by taking her along with the body of her deceased husband or relative to the cremation or burial ground;

    (e) being present at the place where sati committed as an active participant to such commission or to any ceremony connected with it;

    (f) preventing or obstructing the widow or woman from saving herself from being burnt or buried alive;

    (g) obstructing or interfering with, the Police in the discharge of its duties of taking any steps to prevent the commission of sati.

    Punishment for glorification of Sati (Sec. 5):

    As per Section 2(b) of the Act, glorification in relation to sati; whether such sati was committed before or after the commencement of this Act, includes, among other things:

    (i) the observance of any ceremony or the taking out of a procession in connection with the commission of sati; or

    (ii) supporting, justifying or propagating the practice of sati in any manner; or

    (iii) arranging of any function to eulogize the person who has committed sati; or

    (iv) creation of a trust, or the collection of funds, or the construction of a temple or other structure or the carrying on of any form of worship or the performance of any ceremony there with a view to perpetuate the honour of, or to preserve the memory of a person who has committed sati.

    ...view full instructions

    Under which of the Section of The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987, is punishment for glorification of sati prescribed?

    Solution

    We can see after point (g) in above passage, the punishments for various acts that glorify the Sati are mentioned.

    Thus, we can conclude from above that under Section 5of The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987, is punishment for glorification of sati prescribed.

  • Question 5
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the following passage and answer the questions.

    The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act 1987

    Punishment for Abetment of Sati (See 4):

    (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 , if any person commits sati, whoever abets the commission of such sati, either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    (2) If any person attempts to commit sati, whoever abets such attempt either directly or indirectly, shall be punishable with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

    The following act shall also be deemed to be an abetment for the purpose of this Section:

    (a) any inducement to a widow or woman to get her burnt or buried alive along with the body of her deceased husband or with any other relative or with any article, object or thing associated with the husband or with such relative, irrespective of whether she is in a fit state of mind or is labouring under a state of intoxication or stupefaction or other cause impeding the exercise of her free will;

    (b) making a widow or woman believe that the commission of sati would result in some spiritual benefit to her deceased husband or relative or the general well-being of the family;

    (c) encouraging a widow or a woman to remain fixed in her resolve to commit sati and thus instigating her to commit sati;

    (d) participating in any procession in connection with the commission of sati or aiding the widow or woman in her decision to commit sati by taking her along with the body of her deceased husband or relative to the cremation or burial ground;

    (e) being present at the place where sati committed as an active participant to such commission or to any ceremony connected with it;

    (f) preventing or obstructing the widow or woman from saving herself from being burnt or buried alive;

    (g) obstructing or interfering with, the Police in the discharge of its duties of taking any steps to prevent the commission of sati.

    Punishment for glorification of Sati (Sec. 5):

    As per Section 2(b) of the Act, glorification in relation to sati; whether such sati was committed before or after the commencement of this Act, includes, among other things:

    (i) the observance of any ceremony or the taking out of a procession in connection with the commission of sati; or

    (ii) supporting, justifying or propagating the practice of sati in any manner; or

    (iii) arranging of any function to eulogize the person who has committed sati; or

    (iv) creation of a trust, or the collection of funds, or the construction of a temple or other structure or the carrying on of any form of worship or the performance of any ceremony there with a view to perpetuate the honour of, or to preserve the memory of a person who has committed sati.

    ...view full instructions

    Think about the following statements in relation to The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, \(1987 .\)

    a. Arranging of any function to eulogize the person who has committed sati is not a glorification of sati system.

    b. Constitution of temple in order to preserve the memory of a person who has committed sati is a glorification of sati system.

    Solution

    Let us read the acts that glorify the Sati mentioned in above passage as:

    (iii) arranging of any function to eulogize the person who has committed sati. Thus, a is a wrong statement according to this.

    (iv) creation of a trust, or the collection of funds, or the construction of a temple or other structure or the carrying on of any form of worship or the performance of any ceremony there with a view to perpetuate the honour of, or to preserve the memory of a person who has committed sati. Thus, b is correct statement as per this point.

  • Question 6
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: In the following question, parts of a sentence have been jumbled. You are required to rearrange the jumbled parts of the sentence and mark your response accordingly by selecting the correct option.

    ...view full instructions

    1. Research conducted across several negotiators ranging from sales negotiators to purchase and labour negotiators show that average negotiators tend to counter-propose more often than skilled negotiators.

    P. Also, I may have suggested that my son buy a pair of trousers at a certain price whereas my son would have made a counterproposal that he would rather buy two pairs at half price each.

    Q. You may have suggested that you both come in on Saturday to finish the work and your colleague may have counter proposed that you could stay back on Friday evening and finish it instead.

    R. This happens in everyday life too.

    S. Think back to the last time you were discussing completing an assignment with one of your colleagues.

    6. A difference in the frequency of usage of counter proposing between skilled and average negotiators suggests that counter proposing may not be, as effective one tends to think it would be

    Solution

    The proper order is: RSQP

    Reason:

    • The first sentence introduces different types of negotiators. The next sentence is R as the presence of the word 'this' makes it obvious.
    • Sentence S follows which gives us an example. Sentence Q talks further on the discussion with a colleague, making it the following sentence.
    • The next sentence is P which talks about another example that is affirmed by the use of the word 'also'.

    The correct sentence is:

    This happens in everyday life too.Think back to the last time you were discussing completing an assignment with one of your colleagues.You may have suggested that you both come in on Saturday to finish the work and your colleague may have counter proposed that you could stay back on Friday evening and finish it instead.Also, I may have suggested that my son buy a pair of trousers at a certain price whereas my son would have made a counterproposal that he would rather buy two pairs at half price each.

  • Question 7
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: In the following question, parts of a sentence have been jumbled. You are required to rearrange the jumbled parts of the sentence and mark your response accordingly by selecting the correct option.

    ...view full instructions

    1. A bank deals in money and money substitutes; it also provides a range of financial services.

    P. In addition, commissions may be charged for services rendered.

    Q. In general, it covers its expenses and earns its profits by borrowing at one rate of interest and lending at a higher rate.

    R. A bank is under an obligation to repay its customers' balances either on-demand or whenever the amounts credited to them become due.

    S. In a formal sense, it borrows or receives "deposits" from firms, individuals, and (sometimes) governments and, on the basis of these resources, either makes "loans" to others or purchases securities, which are listed as "investments."

    6. For this reason, a bank must hold some cash (which for this purpose may include balances at a bankers' bank, such as a central bank) and keep a further proportion of its assets in forms that can readily be converted into cash.

    Solution

    The proper order is: SQPR

    Reason:

    • The second sentence would be option S because it tells us about the 'system of banking'. Note that the pronoun 'it' refers to 'a bank' mentioned in sentence 1.
    • The third sentence would be option Q because it tells about the working of banks. It also sums up what has been said in S.
    • Option P continues sentence S as indicated by the expression 'in addition". Thus, it forms the fourth sentence.
    • The fifth sentence would be option R progressing towards the customer's needs. It constitutes the 'reason' about which statement 6 talks about.

    The correct sentence is:

    In a formal sense, it borrows or receives "deposits" from firms, individuals, and (sometimes) governments and, on the basis of these resources, either makes "loans" to others or purchases securities, which are listed as "investments."In general, it covers its expenses and earns its profits by borrowing at one rate of interest and lending at a higher rate.In addition, commissions may be charged for services rendered.A bank is under an obligation to repay its customers' balances either on-demand or whenever the amounts credited to them become due.

  • Question 8
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: In the following question, parts of a sentence have been jumbled. You are required to rearrange the jumbled parts of the sentence and mark your response accordingly by selecting the correct option.

    ...view full instructions

    1. With regard to defence, the purpose of the military is to defend the nation and be prepared to do battle with its enemy.

    P. So in the agrarian era, if you need to destroy the enemy's productive capacity, what you want to do is bum his fields, or if you're really vicious, salt them.

    Q. How do you do battle with your enemy?

    R. The idea is to destroy the enemy's productive capacity, and depending upon the economic foundation, that productive capacity is different in each case.

    S. But in the industrial era destroying the enemy's productive capacity means bombing the factories which are located in the cities.

    6. Now in the information era, destroying the enemy's productive capacity means destroying the information infrastructure.

    Solution

    The proper order is: QRPS

    Reason:

    • The paragraph talks about defeating the enemy. The first sentence ends with '..do battle with its enemy'.
    • The next sentence is obviously Q which raises a question on the way of battling an enemy.
    • The sentence that would follow is R that takes us deeper into the strategy of battling an enemy and how to destroy the productive capacity of the enemy.
    • The next sentence is P which talks about destroying it in the agrarian era and the last sentence is S which talks about destroying it in the industrial era.
    • The presence of the word 'but' in sentence S makes it understandable that it is the concluding sentence and something opposite to it has been mentioned before.

    The correct sentence is:

    How do you do battle with your enemy? The idea is to destroy the enemy's productive capacity, and depending upon the economic foundation, that productive capacity is different in each case. So in the agrarian era, if you need to destroy the enemy's productive capacity, what you want to do is bum his fields, or if you're really vicious, salt them. But in the industrial era destroying the enemy's productive capacity means bombing the factories which are located in the cities.

  • Question 9
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to the question out of the four alternatives.

    Besides affecting human health, air pollution is also causing malnutrition in trees by harming fungi that are important for providing mineral nutrients to tree roots. Mycorrhizal fungi are hosted by the trees in their roots to receive nutrients from the soil. These fungi provide essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from the soil in exchange for carbon from the tree. This plant-fungal symbiotic relationship is crucial for the health of the tree. However, high levels of the nutrition elements like nitrogen and phosphorus in the mycorrhizae change them to act as pollutants rather than nutrients.

    The signs of malnutrition can be seen in the form of discolored leaves and excessive falling of leaves. There is an alarming trend of tree malnutrition across Europe, which leaves forests vulnerable to pests, disease, and climate change. The researchers noted that ecosystem changes can negatively affect tree health. Further, they found that the characteristics of the tree-species and nutrient status and the local environmental conditions like the atmospheric pollution and soil variables were the most important predictors of which species of mycorrhizal fungi would be present and their numbers. These also proved to have a large impact on the fungi.

    ...view full instructions

    Which fungi are hosted by the trees in their roots to receive nutrients?

    Solution

    Refer to the second line of the paragraph, “Mycorrhizal fungi is hosted by the trees in their roots to receive nutrients from the soil”.

  • Question 10
    1 / -0.25

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to the question out of the four alternatives.

    Besides affecting human health, air pollution is also causing malnutrition in trees by harming fungi that are important for providing mineral nutrients to tree roots. Mycorrhizal fungi are hosted by the trees in their roots to receive nutrients from the soil. These fungi provide essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from the soil in exchange for carbon from the tree. This plant-fungal symbiotic relationship is crucial for the health of the tree. However, high levels of the nutrition elements like nitrogen and phosphorus in the mycorrhizae change them to act as pollutants rather than nutrients.

    The signs of malnutrition can be seen in the form of discolored leaves and excessive falling of leaves. There is an alarming trend of tree malnutrition across Europe, which leaves forests vulnerable to pests, disease, and climate change. The researchers noted that ecosystem changes can negatively affect tree health. Further, they found that the characteristics of the tree-species and nutrient status and the local environmental conditions like the atmospheric pollution and soil variables were the most important predictors of which species of mycorrhizal fungi would be present and their numbers. These also proved to have a large impact on the fungi.

    ...view full instructions

    Air pollution is affecting trees as malnutrition besides ______

    Solution

    Refer to the starting lines of the passage, “besides affecting human health, air pollution is also affecting malnutrition in trees”.

Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now