Self Studies

Logical Reasoning Test - 17

Result Self Studies

Logical Reasoning Test - 17
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0.25

    Out of the following, who will issue the Secretarial Compliance Certificate?

    Solution

    In pursuit of achieving the highest standards of Corporate Governance, the Company voluntarily obtains Secretarial Compliance Certificate from a Practicing Company Secretary based on the Certificate under Section 383A of the Companies Act, 1956.

  • Question 2
    1 / -0.25

    How was the Constituent Assembly of India formed?

    Solution

    The correct answer is By indirect elections by the members of the Provincial Legislative Assemblies established in 1935.

    The members of this assembly were elected indirectly, that is by the members of the provincial assemblies by the method of a single transferable vote of proportional representation.

    Important facts about the Constituent Assembly

    • In 1934, M N Roy first proposed the idea of a constituent assembly.
    • The demand was taken up by the Congress Party in 1935 as an official demand.
    • The British accepted this in the August Offer of 1940.
    • Under the Cabinet Mission plan of 1946, elections were held for the formation of the constituent assembly.
  • Question 3
    1 / -0.25

    What is a sound mind for the purposes of contracting?

    Solution

    A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time when he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests. A person who is usually of unsound mind, but occasionally of sound mind, may make a contract when he is of sound mind. A person who is usually of sound mind, but occasionally of unsound mind, may not make a contract when he is of unsound mind.

  • Question 4
    1 / -0.25

    In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and decide which of the conclusion logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

    Statement: Quality food is expensive. The restaurant owners are renovating the restaurant as the furniture had become old.

    Conclusion:

    I. The quality of the restaurant’s food will improve.

    II. All restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old.

    Solution

    I. The quality of the restaurant’s food will improve.

    It cannot be concluded as nothing related to quality improvement of food is said.

    II. All restaurants have to be renovated when their furniture becomes old.

    The information does not states that all restaurants have to be renovated.

    Therefore, neither I nor II follows.

  • Question 5
    1 / -0.25

    In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and decide which of the conclusion logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

    Statement:

    The bad behavior of any student results in the defamation of himself and the school.

    Conclusions:

    I. The rules followed in the school are not proper.

    II. Such a student should be expelled from school.

    Solution

    Conclusions:

    I. The rules followed in the school are not proper→ False (some students do not behave properly even if there are strict rules)

    II. Such a student should be expelled from school → False (as there are many students who behave improperly and the removal of a student from school doesn’t correct their behavior)

    Thus, none of the given conclusion follows.

  • Question 6
    1 / -0.25

    In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and decide which of the conclusion logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

    Statement:

    Some people believe that God is in temples.

    Conclusions:

    I. God can be found only in temples.

    II. God is everywhere.

    Solution

    Conclusions:

    I. God can be found only in temples " False (as the word ‘only’ is criticizing the given assumption as it is given that ‘some’ people believe that God is in temples.)

    II. God is everywhere " False (as statement cant conclude God is everywhere)

    Therefore, none of the given conclusion follows.

  • Question 7
    1 / -0.25

    In the question given below is given a statement followed by two conclusions. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true and decide which of the conclusion logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

    Statement:

    I. All chocolates are toffees.

    II. All toffees are sweet

    Conclusion:

    I. Some chocolates are sweet.

    II. All chocolates are sweet.

    Solution

    Given Statement:

    I. All chocolates are toffees.

    II. All toffees are sweet

    The possible Venn diagram is as follows;

    Conclusion:

    I. Some chocolates are sweet. (True, as all chocolates are toffees and all toffees are sweet. So, chocolates are a part of sweet.)

    II. All chocolates are sweet. (True, according to the diagram all chocolates are a part of sweet.)

    Therefore, both conclusions I and II follow.

  • Question 8
    1 / -0.25

    Given below a statement followed by two assumptions. Choose the answer as A, if only the assumption i is implicit in the statement. B, if only assumption ii is implicit in the statement. C, if both the assumptions i and ii are implicit in the statement. D, if none of the assumptions are implicit in the statement.

    Statement: Liquor should be banned throughout the country for the welfare of the people.

    Assumptions:

    i) Consumption of liquor is harmful to people.

    ii) It leads to road accidents.

    Solution

    Assumption I is implicit as the reason why liquor should be banned throughout the country for the welfare of the people is that its consumption is harmful to people.

    Assumption II is not implicit as the statement mentions nothing related to road accidents.

  • Question 9
    1 / -0.25

    Two arguments are given after a statement, you have to decide which argument is strong and which argument is weak.

    Statement: Should complete education for women and girls of all age groups be given free of cost in India?

    Argument I: No, it will weaken our present social structure.

    Argument II: Yes, it only is the way to regain the glory of Indian women.

    Solution

    Given:

    Argument I: No, it will weaken our present social structure.

    As India still has one of the lowest female literacy rates in Asia, educating all women and girls free of cost will actually encourage people to empower the women and girls in society by giving them proper education. Therefore, Argument I is weak.

    Argument II: Yes, it only is the way to regain the glory of Indian women.

    Education plays an important role in empowering Indian women, but it is not just a way to regain the glory of Indian women. Better standard of living, clear water, etc also plays an important role in empowering Indian women. Therefore, Argument II is weak.

    Therefore, both Argument I and II are weak.

    So, the correct answer is "Neither Argument I nor Argument II is strong".

  • Question 10
    1 / -0.25

    In the given question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows the given statement and choose your answer according to that.

    Statement: After this amendment to the Constitution, no child below the age of 14 years will be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment.

    Conclusions:

    I. Before this amendment, children below 14 years were employed to work in factory or mine.

    II. The employers must now abide by this amendment to the Constitution.

    Solution

    The statement mentions that after the amendment, no child below 14 years will be engaged in hazardous employment. This means that before the amendment, the practice of employing children below 14 years was in vogue. This in turn means that employers will have to abide by the amendment. So, both I and II follow.

Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now