Logical Reasoning Test

Result

Logical Reasoning Test - 18

Score
-
out of -
Rank
-
out of -

TIME Taken - -

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Weekly Quiz Competition

Question 1
1 / -0.25

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 provides for special provisions for citizenship for migrants from the following countries:

A. Myanmar

B. Afghanistan

C. Bangladesh

D. Pakistan

A
A, C and D only

B
B, C and D only

C
A, B and C only

D
All of these

Solution

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 provides for special provisions for citizenship for migrants from the following countries:

B. Afghanistan

C. Bangladesh

D. Pakistan
Question 2
1 / -0.25

Nitya is Sam’s Sister. Mogan is Sam’s Father. Selvan is Rajan’s Son. Rajan is Mogan’s Brother. How is Nitya related to Selvan?

A
Daughter

B
Sister

C
Cousin sister

D
Wife

Solution

For the given relationship we can have the following line diagram:

Nitya is Sam’s Sister.

Mogan is Sam’s Father.

Selvan is Rajan’s Son.

Rajan is Mogan’s Brother.

From here we can conclude, Nitya is a cousin sister of Selvan.
Question 3
1 / -0.25

Select the option that is true about the Statements and Conclusion given:

Statement:

No river is sea.

All seas are oceans.

Conclusion:

I. All rivers are oceans.

II. No river is oceans.

A
Only conclusion II follows

B
Only conclusion I follows

C
Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows

D
Both conclusion I and II follows

Solution

Possible Venn diagram for the given statements is as follows:

Conclusions:

I. All rivers are oceans. → False (There is no definite relation between rivers and oceans)

II. No river is oceans. → False (There is no definite relation between rivers and oceans)
Question 4
1 / -0.25

Select the combination of letters that when sequentially placed in the gaps of the given letter series will complete the series.

V__B__ __TBW__T__W

A
TWVVB

B
TWVBV

C
WTVBV

D
TVWBB

Solution

Given series: V__B__ __TBW__T__W

Dividing the series into three parts, we see a general pattern in maintained in every single part and the same is repeated.

V__B__/ __TBW/__T__W

VTBW/VTBW/VTBW
Question 5
1 / -0.25

Directions For Questions

In each question below is given one/more statements that followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.

...view full instructions

Statement:

a) Sunita to Sahil, "Don't you have a presentation to make".

b) Sahil to Sunita, "Why hurry? I will do it tomorrow".

c) Sunita to Sahil," You have been saying the same thing for past five days".

Assumption:

I. Sahil is a procrastinator.

II. Sahil has been very busy in the last few days.

A
Only assumption I is implicit.

B
Only assumption II is implicit.

C
If either assumption I or II is implicit.

D
If neither I nor II is implicit.

Solution

Since Sahil has been stalling his work, this makes him a procrastinator. It is not possible to assume from statement that Sahil was busy or not in the past few days. Therefore, only assumption I is implicit is correct.
Question 6
1 / -0.25

The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

Principle: A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment.

Facts: Sanjay is a driver working in Brooke bond and Co. one day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to the negligence to Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brooke bond and Co.

A
Brooke bond and Co. shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accident.

B
Brooke bond and Co. Shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.

C
Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.

D
None of the above

Solution

Vicarious liability can be defined as a legal doctrine that assigns liability for an injury to a person who did not cause the injury who has a particular relationship to the person who did act negligently. It can also be called as imputed negligence. This doctrine arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability or duty to control" the activities of a violator. So, in the above situation, since the act was not committed in the course of employment, Ruhina will not succeed.
Question 7
1 / -0.25

Under Article 25 of the Constitution of India, the right to profess, practice and propagate religion is subject to the

following restrictions:

A. Public Interest

B. Morality

C. Health

D. Other Provisions of Part III (Fundamental Rights) of the Constitution of India

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

A
A and B only

B
B, C and D only

C
B and C only

D
All of these

Solution

Under Article 25 of the Constitution of India, the right to profess, practice and propagate religion is subject to the Morality, Health and Other Provisions of Part III (Fundamental Rights) of the Constitution of India.
Question 8
1 / -0.25

If you are facing north-east and move 10 m forward, turn left and move 7.5 m, then you are:

A
north of your initial position

B
south of you initial position

C
12.5 m from the initial position

D
Both A and C

Solution
Question 9
1 / -0.25

An agreement not enforceable by law is stated to be void under:

A
section 2(d)

B
section 2(e)

C
section 2(f)

D
section 2(g)

Solution

An agreement not enforceable by law is stated to be void under section 2(g).

The term “void” is given under Section 2(g) of the Act which states as follows: “An agreement not enforceable by law is said to be void.” A void agreement is not enforceable at the option of either party.
Question 10
1 / -0.25

Directions For Questions

The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

...view full instructions

Principle: It is settled principle that an occupier should not do a dangerous act without adequate warning if he knows or suspects that a trespasser is present.

Fact: 'A' was cutting a large tree on his land. Some boys were fooling about nearby. 'A' paid no attention as the boys were clearly trespassers, when the tree fell, one of the boys was hit by a falling branch and suffered injury.

A
The boy was illegally present and cannot have the protection of law.

B
'A' was liable as he did not give warning of the danger likely to arise by the felling of tree although he knew that the boy was present.

C
'A' is not liable as there is no duty to do good and warning a person who was illegally on the premises.

D
'A' was carrying out his lawful profession on his own land and anyone came there, at his peril. Hence 'A' was not liable.

Solution

In the above situation A was negligent as he did not give notice of the danger likely to arise by the falling tree to the boys present nearby. So he is liable for the injury suffered by one of the boys.

User

Question Analysis

Correct -
Wrong -
Skipped -

My Perfomance

Score
-
out of -
Rank
-
out of -

Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition

Logical Reasoning Test - 18

Result

Logical Reasoning Test - 18

Score

-

Rank

-

SHARING IS CARING

Question 1

A, C and D only

B, C and D only

A, B and C only

All of these

Solution

Question 2

Daughter

Sister

Cousin sister

Wife

Solution

Question 3

Only conclusion II follows

Only conclusion I follows

Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows

Both conclusion I and II follows

Solution

Question 4

TWVVB

TWVBV

WTVBV

TVWBB

Solution

Question 5

Only assumption I is implicit.

Only assumption II is implicit.

If either assumption I or II is implicit.

If neither I nor II is implicit.

Solution

Question 6

Brooke bond and Co. shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accident.

Brooke bond and Co. Shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.

Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.

None of the above

Solution

Question 7

A and B only

B, C and D only

B and C only

All of these

Solution

Question 8

north of your initial position

south of you initial position

12.5 m from the initial position

Both A and C

Solution

Question 9

section 2(d)

section 2(e)

section 2(f)

section 2(g)

Solution

Question 10

The boy was illegally present and cannot have the protection of law.

'A' was liable as he did not give warning of the danger likely to arise by the felling of tree although he knew that the boy was present.

'A' is not liable as there is no duty to do good and warning a person who was illegally on the premises.

'A' was carrying out his lawful profession on his own land and anyone came there, at his peril. Hence 'A' was not liable.

Solution

User

Question Analysis

My Perfomance

Score

-

Rank

-

Results Announcement on: coming Monday

Stay Tuned: We’ll update you on your result via email or SMS.