Logical Reasoning Test

Question 1
1 / -0.25

The ideal of 'Welfare State' in the Indian Constitution is enshrined in its:

A
Preamble

B
Directive Principles of State Policy

C
Fundamental Rights

D
Seventh Schedule

Question 2
1 / -0.25

How many times a year an audit committee should meet according to clause 49 listing agreement?

A
At least two times in a year

B
At least three times in a year

C
At least four times in a year

D
At least five times in a year

Question 3
1 / -0.25

An agreement consists of reciprocal promises between at least:

A
Four parties

B
Six parties

C
Three parties

D
Two parties

Question 4
1 / -0.25

When an acceptance may be revoked?

A
An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

B
An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.

C
An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is incomplete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.

D
An acceptance may be revoked at any time after the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.

Question 5
1 / -0.25

Directions For Questions

The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

...view full instructions

Principle: If a person acts in a certain way based on another's promise to do something, then the person who promised is stopped from going back on the promise.

Facts: Karan was drinking at the local bar when he heard Arjun declare that he would pay for anyone who drank an entire pitcher of beer in one go. Karan drank the entire pitcher and asked the barman to hand the bill to Arjun. Must Arjun pay for the beer?

A
Arjun can pay if Karan can prove he drank the pitcher on his own.

B
Arjun needn't pay, since he is getting no consideration and a contract without consideration is void.

C
Arjun must pay for some free drinks at least, to make good his promise.

D
Arjun is bound to pay for the beer.

Question 6
1 / -0.25

Directions For Questions

The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

...view full instructions

Legal Principle: A contract to do an impossible act is void ab initio.

Facts of the Problem: Tarun enters into a contract with Karan to make his dead pet dog alive again through the use of magic. Karan agrees to pay him Rs. 20,000 for the act. Later, when Tarun tries to bring back the dog to life, Karan refuses to pay the money to him. Tarun sues Karan for damages due to non-payment of the agreed consideration by him. Decide the case?

A
The court would direct Karan to pay the agreed amount to Tarun

B
The suit would fail as the contract was void ab initio

C
The court would direct Karan to only pay compensation to Tarun for rescinding the contract

D
The court would allow Tarun to perform his magic procedure to bring back the deade dog to life

Question 7
1 / -0.25

Directions For Questions

The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

...view full instructions

Legal Principle: A contract that is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.

Facts of the Problem: Raj is a leading barrister in the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract.

What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?

A
The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.

B
The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.

C
The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.

D
The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practice trade or profession without any legal restrictions.

Question 8
1 / -0.25

Directions For Questions

The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

...view full instructions

Principle: A master is liable for all acts of his servant.

Facts: A dealer in spare parts asks his servant to watch over the shop as he was going out for lunch. The servant, while doing this, saw a cart coming near the shop and threw some oil on the road just for the fun of seeing the cart skid. The cart skidded and hurt a child walking with his mother. Decide the liability of the dealer.

A
The dealer is not liable, since the act of spilling oil wasn't an authorised one.

B
The dealer is liable on account of the servant's mischief.

C
The dealer is liable since it was the servant's actions that hurt the child.

D
The dealer is not liable since the damage was too remote.

Question 9
1 / -0.25

Directions For Questions

The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.

...view full instructions

Legal Principle: The acceptance of an agreement by both parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.

Facts of the Problem: Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?

A
Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.

B
Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.

C
The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in open market.

D
The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.

Question 10
1 / -0.25

When a proposal may be revoked?

A
A proposal may be revoked at any time when the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

B
A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is incomplete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

C
A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

D
A proposal may be revoked at any time after the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

Submit Test

Logical Reasoni...

Question 1

Preamble

Directive Principles of State Policy

Fundamental Rights

Seventh Schedule

Question 2

At least two times in a year

At least three times in a year

At least four times in a year

At least five times in a year

Question 3

Four parties

Six parties

Three parties

Two parties

Question 4

An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.

An acceptance may be revoked at any time before the communication of the acceptance is incomplete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.

An acceptance may be revoked at any time after the communication of the acceptance is complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards.

Question 5

Arjun can pay if Karan can prove he drank the pitcher on his own.

Arjun needn't pay, since he is getting no consideration and a contract without consideration is void.

Arjun must pay for some free drinks at least, to make good his promise.

Arjun is bound to pay for the beer.

Question 6

The court would direct Karan to pay the agreed amount to Tarun

The suit would fail as the contract was void ab initio

The court would direct Karan to only pay compensation to Tarun for rescinding the contract

The court would allow Tarun to perform his magic procedure to bring back the deade dog to life

Question 7

The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.

The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.

The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.

The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practice trade or profession without any legal restrictions.

Question 8

The dealer is not liable, since the act of spilling oil wasn't an authorised one.

The dealer is liable on account of the servant's mischief.

The dealer is liable since it was the servant's actions that hurt the child.

The dealer is not liable since the damage was too remote.

Question 9

Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.

Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.

The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in open market.

The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.

Question 10

A proposal may be revoked at any time when the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is incomplete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

A proposal may be revoked at any time after the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, but not afterwards.

User

Question Analysis

Results Announcement on: coming Monday

Stay Tuned: We’ll update you on your result via email or SMS.