Judiciary Test

Result

Judiciary Test - 1

Score
-
out of -
Rank
-
out of -

TIME Taken - -

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Weekly Quiz Competition

Question 1
1 / -0

Which case established the doctrine that there is a basic structure of the Constitution which cannot be violated?

A
Golaknath v. State of Punjab

B
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

C
Keshavananda Bharati v. Union of India

D
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India

Solution

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is the case that established the doctrine of the basic structure of the Constitution.
Question 2
1 / -0

What issue remained unresolved between the legislature and the judiciary following the Kesavananda Bharati case?

A
Executive authority over judiciary appointments

B
Judicial interference in parliamentary procedures

C
Parliament's power to amend fundamental rights

D
The judiciary's authority to regulate executive decisions

Solution

The issue of whether the judiciary can intervene in and regulate the functioning of legislatures remained unresolved following the Kesavananda Bharati case.
Question 3
1 / -0

What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Parliament's attempt to amend the Constitution to restrict fundamental rights?

A
It supported the Parliament's attempt.

B
It declared the attempted amendments unconstitutional.

C
It deferred the decision to the executive branch.

D
It referred the matter to the President for approval.

Solution

The Supreme Court declared the Parliament's attempted amendments to restrict fundamental rights unconstitutional.
Question 4
1 / -0

How is the independence of judiciary protected regarding judicial appointments?

A
Judges are appointed solely based on their political affiliations.

B
The legislature has a major role in the appointment process.

C
Judges must have experience in law, and political opinions are not considered.

D
The executive can influence judicial appointments directly.

Solution

The independence of judiciary in appointments is ensured by appointing judges based on their legal experience rather than political affiliations.
Question 5
1 / -0

What did the Supreme Court establish in the Kesavananda Bharati case regarding the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution?

A
Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is absolute.

B
Fundamental rights cannot be abridged through constitutional amendments.

C
Parliament can abrogate any fundamental right through amendments.

D
The judiciary has no authority to review constitutional amendments.

Solution

The Supreme Court established in the Kesavananda Bharati case that fundamental rights cannot be abridged through constitutional amendments.
Question 6
1 / -0

What was the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the Parliament's power to amend fundamental rights during the period of 1967 and 1973?

A
The Parliament could freely amend fundamental rights without restrictions.

B
The Parliament's attempts to amend fundamental rights were deemed unconstitutional.

C
The Supreme Court deferred the decision to the executive branch.

D
The Supreme Court declared fundamental rights non-enforceable.

Solution

The Supreme Court ruled during the period of 1967 and 1973 that the Parliament's attempts to amend fundamental rights were unconstitutional.
Question 7
1 / -0

What does judicial activism primarily entail?

A
Limiting the judiciary's role to responding to cases brought before it.

B
Restricting access to justice for vulnerable groups.

C
Taking an active role in addressing social issues and protecting rights.

D
Following strict procedural formalities in legal proceedings.

Solution

Judicial activism entails taking an active role in addressing social issues and protecting rights beyond traditional case responses.
Question 8
1 / -0

Which organ of government has the authority to settle disputes and decide whether laws comply with the Constitution?

A
Parliament

B
Executive

C
Judiciary

D
President

Solution

The judiciary has the authority to settle disputes and decide whether laws comply with the Constitution.
Question 9
1 / -0

How are judicial salaries determined to maintain independence?

A
Salaries are set by the executive.

B
Legislative approval is required for judicial salaries.

C
Judges' salaries are immune from legislative approval.

D
Salaries are determined based on judges' political loyalties.

Solution

Judicial salaries are not subjected to legislative approval, ensuring financial independence of the judiciary.
Question 10
1 / -0

What does the concept of independence of judiciary imply?

A
Other organs of government should not interfere with judicial decisions.

B
Judiciary can function arbitrarily without any accountability.

C
Judges should align their decisions with the political ideologies of the ruling party.

D
The judiciary has unlimited power over the executive and legislature.

Solution

Independence of judiciary means that other organs of government should not interfere with judicial decisions, ensuring the judiciary can function impartially.

User

Question Analysis

Correct -
Wrong -
Skipped -

My Perfomance

Score
-
out of -
Rank
-
out of -

Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition

Judiciary Test - 1

Result

Judiciary Test - 1

Score

-

Rank

-

SHARING IS CARING

Question 1

Golaknath v. State of Punjab

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

Keshavananda Bharati v. Union of India

Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India

Solution

Question 2

Executive authority over judiciary appointments

Judicial interference in parliamentary procedures

Parliament's power to amend fundamental rights

The judiciary's authority to regulate executive decisions

Solution

Question 3

It supported the Parliament's attempt.

It declared the attempted amendments unconstitutional.

It deferred the decision to the executive branch.

It referred the matter to the President for approval.

Solution

Question 4

Judges are appointed solely based on their political affiliations.

The legislature has a major role in the appointment process.

Judges must have experience in law, and political opinions are not considered.

The executive can influence judicial appointments directly.

Solution

Question 5

Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is absolute.

Fundamental rights cannot be abridged through constitutional amendments.

Parliament can abrogate any fundamental right through amendments.

The judiciary has no authority to review constitutional amendments.

Solution

Question 6

The Parliament could freely amend fundamental rights without restrictions.

The Parliament's attempts to amend fundamental rights were deemed unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court deferred the decision to the executive branch.

The Supreme Court declared fundamental rights non-enforceable.

Solution

Question 7

Limiting the judiciary's role to responding to cases brought before it.

Restricting access to justice for vulnerable groups.

Taking an active role in addressing social issues and protecting rights.

Following strict procedural formalities in legal proceedings.

Solution

Question 8

Parliament

Executive

Judiciary

President

Solution

Question 9

Salaries are set by the executive.

Legislative approval is required for judicial salaries.

Judges' salaries are immune from legislative approval.

Salaries are determined based on judges' political loyalties.

Solution

Question 10

Other organs of government should not interfere with judicial decisions.

Judiciary can function arbitrarily without any accountability.

Judges should align their decisions with the political ideologies of the ruling party.

The judiciary has unlimited power over the executive and legislature.

Solution

User

Question Analysis

My Perfomance

Score

-

Rank

-

Results Announcement on: coming Monday

Stay Tuned: We’ll update you on your result via email or SMS.