Logical Reasoning Test - 5

(1) Q lives on top floor, in an odd numbered flat.

(Q stays in either flat 1 or flat 3)

(2) T lives in flat number 3, on 3rd floor.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(3) Only two floors are there between A and D who lives in an even numbered flat.

(4) B and D stay in the same numbered flat and on an odd numbered floor.

Since B and D stays on odd floor, So A stays on top floor and D stays on floor 1.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(5) U lives on a floor immediately above W.

(6) Neither U nor W lives on the same floor on which T lives.

(7) U does not live in an odd numbered flat.

Therefore, W lives on floor 1.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(8) Only one floor is there between V and Q.

V lives on floor 2.

(9) C lives immediate below the flat of S who is living on even floor.

(10) C lives in the same numbered flat as A.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(11) R and S live in the same numbered flat.

W lives on floor 1 (refer point 7)

Thus, case 1 eliminates.

Case 2:

C and D stay with W on the same floor.

(1) Q lives on top floor, in an odd numbered flat.

(Q stays in either flat 1 or flat 3)

(2) T lives in flat number 3, on 3rd floor.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(3) Only two floors are there between A and D who lives in an even numbered flat.

(4) B and D stay in the same numbered flat and on an odd numbered floor.

Since B and D stays on odd floor, So A stays on top floor and D stays on floor 1.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(5) U lives on a floor immediately above W.

(6) Neither U nor W lives on the same floor on which T lives.

(7) U does not live in an odd numbered flat.

Therefore, W lives on floor 1.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(8) Only one floor is there between V and Q.

V lives on floor 2.

(9) C lives immediate below the flat of S who is living on even floor.

(10) C lives in the same numbered flat as A.

Case 1:

 Case 2:

(11) R and S live in the same numbered flat.

W lives on floor 1 (refer point 7)

Thus, case 1 eliminates.

Case 2:

Thus, P and Q stay above B.

Person: P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W

1). P is sitting second to T but third, from the right of R.

2). R is not the immediate neighbor of S.

3). Only three people sit between S and T.

4). S and T are not the immediate neighbors of Q and U respectively.

(Case II  eliminates because R is not the immediate neighbor of S )

8). Q and U are not the immediate neighbors.

(Case I eliminates because Q and W are not the immediate neighbors)

So, There are four people sitting between P and V.

Person: P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W

1). P is sitting second to T but third, from the right of R.

2). R is not the immediate neighbor of S.

3). Only three people sit between S and T.

4). S and T are not the immediate neighbors of Q and U respectively.

(Case II eliminates because R is not the immediate neighbor of S )

8). Q and U are not the immediate neighbors.

(Case I eliminates because Q and W are not the immediate neighbors)

So, P and T are immediate neighbors of W.

Person: P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W

1). P is sitting second to T but third, from the right of R.

2). R is not the immediate neighbor of S.

3). Only three people sit between S and T.

4). S and T are not the immediate neighbors of Q and U respectively.

(Case II eliminates because R is not the immediate neighbor of S )

8). Q and U are not the immediate neighbors.

(Case I eliminates because Q and W are not the immediate neighbors)

So, U is sitting exactly between Q and T.

Person: P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W

1). P is sitting second to T but third, from the right of R.

2). R is not the immediate neighbor of S.

3). Only three people sit between S and T.

4). S and T are not the immediate neighbors of Q and U respectively.

(Case II eliminates because R is not the immediate neighbor of S )

8). Q and U are not the immediate neighbors.

(Case I eliminates because Q and W are not the immediate neighbors)

So, S is sitting third to the left of R.

Person: P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, and W

1). P is sitting second to T but third, from the right of R.

2). R is not the immediate neighbor of S.

3). Only three people sit between S and T.

4). S and T are not the immediate neighbors of Q and U respectively.

(Case II eliminates because R is not the immediate neighbor of S )

8). Q and U are not the immediate neighbors.

(Case I eliminates because Q and W are not the immediate neighbors)

So, Five people are sitting between R and W when counted from R.

1. Sainoor is taller than Piyu but shortet than Navya.

2. Kianshi is taller than only two persons, which means Kianshi is the 3^rd shortest person.

3. Gauri is the seventh tallest person, which means Gauri is the shortest person.

4. Navya is shorter than only one person, which means Navya is 2nd tallest person.

5. Equal number of people are taller and shorter than Piyu, which means Piyu is at the 4th position only then equal number of people can be shorter and taller than her.

Now we know that, Sainoor is taller than Piyu, but shorter than Navya.

As, we know that Simar is neither the tallest nor the shortest, so clearly Simar is second shortest person, Sainoor is not the tallest and Manya is the only person left, so Manya is the tallest.           

So, Manya is the tallest.

1. Sainoor is taller than Piyu but shortet than Navya.

2. Kianshi is taller than only two persons, which means Kianshi is the 3^rd shortest person.

3. Gauri is the seventh tallest person, which means Gauri is the shortest person.

4. Navya is shorter than only one person, which means Navya is 2nd tallest person.

5. Equal number of people are taller and shorter than Piyu, which means Piyu is at the 4th position only then equal number of people can be shorter and taller than her.

Now we know that, Sainoor is taller than Piyu, but shorter than Navya.

As, we know that Simar is neither the tallest nor the shortest, so clearly Simar is second shortest person, Sainoor is not the tallest and Manya is the only person left, so Manya is the tallest.           

So, 2 persons are taller and 4 persons are shorter than Sainoor.

From statements I and II,

In these two statements, we can see that only ‘work’ is common and we did not get code for ‘hard’. So, these two statements are not sufficient to answer the question.

From statements II and III, 

In these two statements, we get nothing common. So, these statements are not sufficient to answer the question.

From statements I and III,

In these two statements, we can see that ‘they’ and ‘very’ are common but still we will not get the code for ‘hard’. So, these two statements are not sufficient to answer the question.

From statements I, II and III, 

‘work’→ li  (From statements I and II)

They/very → na/ha  (From statements I and III)

Thus, the code for ‘hard’ is ‘ti’.

So, the data in all the statements together is sufficient.