Self Studies

VARC Test - 11

Result Self Studies

VARC Test - 11
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0

    Direction: In the following sentence, a part of the sentence is underlined. Below are given alternatives to the underlined part, which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative. In case no improvement is needed, choose the option ‘No improvement’.

    Converting to more sustainable energy sources is one way to reduce the reliant on oil products.

    Solution

    Correct sentence: Converting to more sustainable energy sources is one way to reduce the reliance on oil products.

    • In the given sentence, the adjective 'reliant' is used and it is incorrect. The word 'reliant' means 'dependent on someone'.
    • The dependence on something is mentioned in the sentence. Thus, the noun 'reliance' should be used here instead of the adjective 'reliant'.
  • Question 2
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may _______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    Solution

    In the first blank, before the blank, there is a modal verb hence we need a base verb and in the second blank, we need a gerund because before the blank there is a preposition hence we need to write a prepositional object that can be a noun/pronoun/gerund.

    Let's see the meanings of the given words-

    • Dampen → is a verb that means 'reduce or make less strong or intense.'
    • Embarking → is a verb that means 'begin'
    • Undertake → is a verb that means 'formally guarantee, pledge, or promise.'
    • Obstructing → is a verb that means 'prevent or hinder.'
    • Venture → is a noun that means a risky or daring journey

    So according to the meaning, the first blank will have 'Dampen' and the second blank will have 'embarking'.

  • Question 3
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    The following sentence may or may not contain an error in one of its parts. Identify the part containing the error. If the sentence is correct, select 'No error' as your answer.

    Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d)

    Solution

    In part a, of the sentence, the usage of 'prior' is incorrect Instead, use 'prior to'.

    According to grammar, 'You use ’prior’(adjective) to indicate that something has already happened, or must happen before another event takes place.' On the other hand, ‘Prior to’ is a preposition that means in advance of or before.

    So the correct sentence is: Prior to that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing of minority stakes in a bunch of public sector firms, a policy that was replayed when the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014.

  • Question 4
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    The following sentence may or may not contain an error in one of its parts. Identify the part containing the error. If the sentence is correct, select 'No error' as your answer.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d)

    Solution

    In part a of the sentence, the usage of 'entrusted to' is incorrect instead, use 'entrusted with'

    • Let's see the meaning of the verb 'entrust'- Assign a responsibility. Here, we need to use the preposition 'with' because 'entrust with' is a phrasal verb.
    • Also, entrust is a transitive verb but in the given sentence it is used in the passive voice hence we need to use the preposition after it.

    So the correct sentence is: The NITI Aayog has been entrusted with suggesting which public sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered for privatization or merger or ‘subsidiarisation’ with another public sector firm, or simply closed.

  • Question 5
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following is a synonym of the word "Turmoil"?

    Solution

    Let's see the meaning of the given words:

    • Tumult → is a noun that means 'agitation or social unrest'
    • Calm → is an adjective that means not showing or feeling nervousness'
    • Tranquility → is an adjective that means 'free from disturbance'
    • Accord → is a verb that means 'be harmonious or consistent with'
    • Peacefulness → is a noun that means 'free from disturbance'
  • Question 6
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following is a synonym of the word "Unveiled"?

    Solution

    Let's see the meaning of the given words:

    • Unveiled → is a verb that means 'shown or announced publicly for the first time.'
    • Divulged → is a verb that means 'made known (secret information)'
    • Concealed → is a verb that means 'kept secret, prevented from being known.'
    • Enshrouded → is a verb that means 'hid from the view.'
    • Disguised → is a verb that means 'hid one's true identity'.
    • Serendipity → is a noun that means 'the occurrence and development of events by chance in a happy or beneficial way.'
  • Question 7
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    According to the passage, which of these is required for a nation to be developed?

    Solution

    It is mentioned in the passage, Second Paragraph, first line: “ 'there is no developed country in the world, which does not have a robust education system. The path for India to become a developed nation is to provide good education to our children irrespective of their socio-economic background.”

  • Question 8
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    What is the reason for developing world-class skill centres and skill-based courses?

    Solution

    It is clearly mentioned that (fifth Paragraph, first line) in order to enable the needy students to get employment, we are planning for world-class skill centres and skill-based courses through which they can directly enter the job market, Kejriwal said. Options (B) and (C) are nowhere mentioned as the reason for the development of skill-centres and skill-based courses.

  • Question 9
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of these statements best describes the relation between government and universities?

    Solution

    It is clearly mentioned universities and governments do not just have a financial relationship.

    So, option (A) is incorrect. Universities and governments do not just have a financial relationship. Universities have to lead the government in the right direction by providing important insights and the government has to provide leadership to universities and back them for them to flourish.

  • Question 10
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.

    The government had revealed the broad contours of the policy in May 2020 as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package unveiled in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategic sectors identified at the time for retaining certain public sector entities within the government’s control remain the same in the final policy approved by the Cabinet. These are atomic energy, space and defence, transport and telecommunications, power, petroleum, coal and other minerals, and lastly, banking, insurance, and financial services. While the initial plan was to retain one to four public sector firms in these sectors, this has now been replaced by the phrase “bare minimum presence”. Once the government decides what is the bare minimum number of firms it wants to retain, the rest of the firms will be privatized, merged, or subsidized with other CPSEs, or closed. For all firms in sectors considered non-strategic, privatization or closure are the only two options being considered. The policy’s objective is to minimize the public sector’s role and create new investment space for the private sector, in the hope that the infusion of private capital, technology, and management practices will contribute to the growth and new jobs. The proceeds from the sale of these firms would finance various government-run social sector and developmental programs.

    This is the first time since 2004 that India is working on a slew of privatization deals. Earlier, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government between 1999 and 2004 had managed to sell off majority stakes in dozen-odd public sector enterprises, including Modern Foods, Balco, Hindustan Zinc, VSNL, and a few hotels. A separate Ministry had been formed just for disinvestment, led initially by the late Arun Jaitley and then by Arun Shourie, who drove the process.

    An attempt to sell Air India at the time had, however, got stalled in the face of a political outcry. Prior that, the early 1990s saw the stock market listing /(a) of minority stakes in a bunch of public /(b) sector firms, a policy that was replayed when /(c) the UPA government was in office from 2004 to 2014./(d) The new policy goes beyond the Vajpayee-era privatization drive, which was limited to a ‘case-by-case’ sale of entities in non-strategic sectors, by stressing that even strategic sectors will have a ‘bare minimum’ presence of government-owned firms.

    The NITI Aayog has been entrusted to suggesting which public /(a) sector firms in strategic sectors should be retained, considered /(b) for privatization or merger or ‘subsidization’ /(c) with another public sector firm, or simply closed./(d) A core group of secretaries on disinvestment will consider the NITI Aayog’s suggestions and forward its views to a ministerial group. Apart from the Finance Minister, the group will include Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari and the minister in charge of the administrative ministry of the public sector enterprise concerned. After the ministerial group’s nod, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management in the Finance Ministry will move a proposal to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs for an ‘in-principle nod to sell specific CPSEs. The NITI Aayog is expected to soon formalize its recommendations on which of the 77 public sector companies in strategic sectors should remain with the government.

    The turmoil in the global economy could impact the valuations of firms being privatized, as many potential investors may not have the appetite for bidding in these times. The prospect of post-deal scrutiny by audit and investigating agencies, like the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India) and the CBI, will be a source of worry for officials, with similar cases pertaining to the Vajpayee-era transactions still cropping up in courts. Privatization is a good idea, but doing it during a recession may ______ economic recovery as investors will end up buying existing capacities instead of _______ on fresh investments.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of these is similar in meaning to the word ''robust''?

    Solution

    Robust means strong and healthy; vigorous.

    Fragile means easily broken or damaged.

    Lethargic means a lack of energy and enthusiasm.

    Sturdy means strongly and solidly built.

Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now