Self Studies

VARC Test - 7

Result Self Studies

VARC Test - 7
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
TIME Taken - -
Self Studies

SHARING IS CARING

If our Website helped you a little, then kindly spread our voice using Social Networks. Spread our word to your readers, friends, teachers, students & all those close ones who deserve to know what you know now.

Self Studies Self Studies
Weekly Quiz Competition
  • Question 1
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Directions: The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the fourth sentence of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R, S and T. These five parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order.

    1. In keeping with its hardline stance on trade matters, the US continues to press for damages against India on poultry import curbs, despite India having relaxed them in recent months.

    P. Now, US poultry imports have started to arrive, but the US is yet to withdraw its claim of $450 million in annual damages to its industry, made before the ‘retaliatory panel’ of the WTO.

    Q. Citing avian influenza concerns, India had for years virtually banned poultry imports from the US, prompting the latter to move the WTO.

    4. Since then, India has made two rounds of changes in its bird flu regulations, to bring them in line with WTO norms.

    R. The US, using all possible means to push exports, is merely pursuing a hard bargain.

    S. In 2015, the WTO ruled against India, saying that its curbs were disproportionate to the threat and constituted a non-tariff barrier.

    T. Meanwhile, the WTO’s compliance panel is yet to rule on whether India’s amended regulations are acceptable.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following should be the THIRD sentence after rearrangement?

    Solution

    The correct order of sentences is 1QS4PTR.

    Sentence 1 is given. Now, sentence 2 should continue talking about the idea or topic introduced. Sentence Q provides the necessary background information about the topic and it is the 2nd sentence. Now 4th sentence mention a time period by ‘since then’ and it refers to the 2015 ruling of WTO in sentence S thus 1QS4 is our first four sentences. Now, sentence P is the obvious 5th sentence as it now shows the effect of the WTO ruling. Sentence T also talks about a WTO panel and it will follow sentence P. Sentence R is a good concluding sentence as it ends the passage with a final thought.

  • Question 2
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Directions: The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the fourth sentence of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R, S and T. These five parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order.

    1. In keeping with its hardline stance on trade matters, the US continues to press for damages against India on poultry import curbs, despite India having relaxed them in recent months.

    P. Now, US poultry imports have started to arrive, but the US is yet to withdraw its claim of $450 million in annual damages to its industry, made before the ‘retaliatory panel’ of the WTO.

    Q. Citing avian influenza concerns, India had for years virtually banned poultry imports from the US, prompting the latter to move the WTO.

    4. Since then, India has made two rounds of changes in its bird flu regulations, to bring them in line with WTO norms.

    R. The US, using all possible means to push exports, is merely pursuing a hard bargain.

    S. In 2015, the WTO ruled against India, saying that its curbs were disproportionate to the threat and constituted a non-tariff barrier.

    T. Meanwhile, the WTO’s compliance panel is yet to rule on whether India’s amended regulations are acceptable.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following should be the SIXTH sentence after rearrangement?

    Solution

    The correct order of sentences is 1QS4PTR.

    Sentence 1 is given. Now, sentence 2 should continue talking about the idea or topic introduced. Sentence Q provides the necessary background information about the topic and it is the 2nd sentence. Now 4th sentence mention a time period by ‘since then’ and it refers to the 2015 ruling of WTO in sentence S thus 1QS4 is our first four sentences. Now, sentence P is the obvious 5th sentence as it now shows the effect of the WTO ruling. Sentence T also talks about a WTO panel and it will follow sentence P. Sentence R is a good concluding sentence as it ends the passage with a final thought.

  • Question 3
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Directions: The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the fourth sentence of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R, S and T. These five parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order.

    1. In keeping with its hardline stance on trade matters, the US continues to press for damages against India on poultry import curbs, despite India having relaxed them in recent months.

    P. Now, US poultry imports have started to arrive, but the US is yet to withdraw its claim of $450 million in annual damages to its industry, made before the ‘retaliatory panel’ of the WTO.

    Q. Citing avian influenza concerns, India had for years virtually banned poultry imports from the US, prompting the latter to move the WTO.

    4. Since then, India has made two rounds of changes in its bird flu regulations, to bring them in line with WTO norms.

    R. The US, using all possible means to push exports, is merely pursuing a hard bargain.

    S. In 2015, the WTO ruled against India, saying that its curbs were disproportionate to the threat and constituted a non-tariff barrier.

    T. Meanwhile, the WTO’s compliance panel is yet to rule on whether India’s amended regulations are acceptable.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following should be the LAST sentence after rearrangement?

    Solution

    The correct order of sentences is 1QS4PTR.

    Sentence 1 is given. Now, sentence 2 should continue talking about the idea or topic introduced. Sentence Q provides the necessary background information about the topic and it is the 2nd sentence. Now 4th sentence mention a time period by ‘since then’ and it refers to the 2015 ruling of WTO in sentence S thus 1QS4 is our first four sentences. Now, sentence P is the obvious 5th sentence as it now shows the effect of the WTO ruling. Sentence T also talks about a WTO panel and it will follow sentence P. Sentence R is a good concluding sentence as it ends the passage with a final thought.

  • Question 4
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Directions: The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the fourth sentence of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R, S and T. These five parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order.

    1. In keeping with its hardline stance on trade matters, the US continues to press for damages against India on poultry import curbs, despite India having relaxed them in recent months.

    P. Now, US poultry imports have started to arrive, but the US is yet to withdraw its claim of $450 million in annual damages to its industry, made before the ‘retaliatory panel’ of the WTO.

    Q. Citing avian influenza concerns, India had for years virtually banned poultry imports from the US, prompting the latter to move the WTO.

    4. Since then, India has made two rounds of changes in its bird flu regulations, to bring them in line with WTO norms.

    R. The US, using all possible means to push exports, is merely pursuing a hard bargain.

    S. In 2015, the WTO ruled against India, saying that its curbs were disproportionate to the threat and constituted a non-tariff barrier.

    T. Meanwhile, the WTO’s compliance panel is yet to rule on whether India’s amended regulations are acceptable.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following should be the FIFTH sentence after rearrangement?

    Solution

    The correct order of sentences is 1QS4PTR.

    Sentence 1 is given. Now, sentence 2 should continue talking about the idea or topic introduced. Sentence Q provides the necessary background information about the topic and it is the 2nd sentence. Now 4th sentence mention a time period by ‘since then’ and it refers to the 2015 ruling of WTO in sentence S thus 1QS4 is our first four sentences. Now, sentence P is the obvious 5th sentence as it now shows the effect of the WTO ruling. Sentence T also talks about a WTO panel and it will follow sentence P. Sentence R is a good concluding sentence as it ends the passage with a final thought.

  • Question 5
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Directions: The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the fourth sentence of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R, S and T. These five parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order.

    1. In keeping with its hardline stance on trade matters, the US continues to press for damages against India on poultry import curbs, despite India having relaxed them in recent months.

    P. Now, US poultry imports have started to arrive, but the US is yet to withdraw its claim of $450 million in annual damages to its industry, made before the ‘retaliatory panel’ of the WTO.

    Q. Citing avian influenza concerns, India had for years virtually banned poultry imports from the US, prompting the latter to move the WTO.

    4. Since then, India has made two rounds of changes in its bird flu regulations, to bring them in line with WTO norms.

    R. The US, using all possible means to push exports, is merely pursuing a hard bargain.

    S. In 2015, the WTO ruled against India, saying that its curbs were disproportionate to the threat and constituted a non-tariff barrier.

    T. Meanwhile, the WTO’s compliance panel is yet to rule on whether India’s amended regulations are acceptable.

    ...view full instructions

    Which of the following should be the SECOND sentence after rearrangement?

    Solution

    The correct order of sentences is 1QS4PTR.

    Sentence 1 is given. Now, sentence 2 should continue talking about the idea or topic introduced. Sentence Q provides the necessary background information about the topic and it is the 2nd sentence. Now 4th sentence mention a time period by ‘since then’ and it refers to the 2015 ruling of WTO in sentence S thus 1QS4 is our first four sentences. Now, sentence P is the obvious 5th sentence as it now shows the effect of the WTO ruling. Sentence T also talks about a WTO panel and it will follow sentence P. Sentence R is a good concluding sentence as it ends the passage with a final thought.

  • Question 6
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Choose the most appropriate synonym.

    ...view full instructions

    Quirk

    Solution

    Quirk means an aspect of somebody's character or behavior that is strange. Its synonyms are- peculiarity, oddity, eccentricity, foible, whim, whimsy, notion, conceit. Its antonyms are-conformity and sameness.

    Peculiarity means a characteristic or a quality that only belongs to one particular person, thing or place.

  • Question 7
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Choose the most appropriate synonym.

    ...view full instructions

    Ambushed

    Solution

    Ambushed means to suddenly attack someone after hiding and waiting for them.

    Example:

    The king's enemies planned to ambush the royal coach on the way to Paris and capture the king.

    Stephen had ambushed the Rude Boy and taken the upper hand. Ambushed synonyms are- trap, snare, pitfall, lure, ambuscade. Ambushed antonyms are- frankness and honesty.

  • Question 8
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: In the following question a short passage is given with one of the lines in the passage missing and represented by a blank. Select the best out of the five answer choices given, to make the passage complete and coherent.

    ...view full instructions

    I am sometimes accused of imposing ‘rules‘. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate rules. All I do is report on how customers react to different stimuli. I may say to an advertiser, “Research shows that ads with celebs are inefficient in persuading people to buy products. Are you sure you want to use a celebrity?” Call that a rule? Or I may say to a writer, “Research suggests that if you set the copy in red type on a white background, more people will read it than if you set it in red type on a black background.” ______________________.

    Solution

    In the given passage, the speaker gives examples of how his suggestions are taken across as rules.

    The question raised in the passage, ‘Call it a rule?’ is very crucial in determining the answer.

  • Question 9
    1 / -0

    Directions For Questions

    Direction: Read the sentence given below to find out if it contains any error. The error, if any, will be in one part of the sentence. If the sentence is error-free, select option (E). Ignore error of punctuation if any.

    ...view full instructions

    Dean wasn't sure if it was her (A)/ natural aversion to anything (B)/ involving law enforcement (C)/ or concern to her boss' future (D)/. No error (E)

    Solution

    The error lies in part (D) of the question.

    Instead of the preposition 'to', 'for' will be used.

    'Concern for her boss' future' - is the correct usage of the preposition 'to'.

    Example-

    She has a genuine concern for her friends.

    The correct sentence- "Dean wasn't sure if it was her natural aversion to anything involving law enforcement or concern for her boss's future."

  • Question 10
    1 / -0

    The following items have one part of the sentence followed by four alternatives. Complete the sentences by choosing the correct alternative.

    If you had planned the work well

    Solution

    Correct Sentence: If you had planned the work well you could have completed it on time.

    ​Conditional sentences are statements discussing known factors or hypothetical situations and their consequences.

    One of the structures is mentioned below:

    This particular type is followed when we talk about something in the past which is purely imaginary.

    If + Subject + had + V3 + object, Subject + Would/could have + V3 + Object.

    Example:If I had noticed you, I would have called you.

Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Correct -

  • Wrong -

  • Skipped -

My Perfomance
  • Score

    -

    out of -
  • Rank

    -

    out of -
Re-Attempt Weekly Quiz Competition
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now