Self Studies

Judiciary - Con...

TIME LEFT -
  • Question 1
    1 / -0

    PRINCIPLE: Whoever by words, either spoken or written brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government established law in India shall be punished. However, comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence.
    FACTS: A renowned Professor of Economics wrote a critical comment on the economic policies of the Government of India in a National Daily. This piece of writing generated academic debate not only in the print media but also on television and internet. A student of law asked the fellow Indians on a social networking website to assemble at a particular place for peaceful and silent demonstration against the said economic policies on a stipulated date and time. The crowd assembled at that venue and started shouting anti-government slogans. Police arrested the professor.

  • Question 2
    1 / -0

    PRINCIPLE: Whoever does not act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life of the personal safety of others is said to have committed an offence.
    FACTS: Mr. Mangeskar owns a Yamaha motorcycle which has a very good pick up and speed. He is in the IV semester of Mechanical Engineering degree course. One day he was getting late for the college as he woke up late in the morning. He got ready and was rushing to the college so that he would not miss the class. He was riding the motor cycle at a speed of 140 km per hour in Bangalore city which was crowded. He was very good in riding the motorcycle. People who were using the road got annoyed/scared with the way Mr. Mangeskar was riding the motortcycle.

  • Question 3
    1 / -0

    Is Lucky guilty of criminal damage?

  • Question 4
    1 / -0

    LEGAL PRINCIPLE: If a person without any authority prevents a person to proceed to any direction and is kept confined, he commits an offence of criminal confinement.
    FACTUAL SITUATION: The Municipal Board allowed X to hold a marriage party blocking a part of a public road. The marriage party blocked most of the roads and did not allow A, a passerby, to cross the road. He brings a charge of criminal confinement against the head of the marriage party and other associates. Can A succeed?

  • Question 5
    1 / -0

    The gist of the offence of criminal conspiracy is _____.

  • Question 6
    1 / -0

    Which of the following is the subject matter of the 99th Constitution Amendment Act, 2014, which came into force with effect from 13th April, 2015 ___________.

  • Question 7
    1 / -0

    LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A person is guilty of culpable homicide amounting to murder if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention to cause death.
    FACTUAL SITUATION: A was hiding behind a bush to catch some rabbits. B also came to the same place for hunting with his gun. When B noticed some movements behind the bush, he though it was an animal and fired a shot due to which A was killed. Can B be prosecuted for murder?
    DECISION will be _____.

  • Question 8
    1 / -0

    LEGAL PRINCIPLE: Any act done in the exercise of right of private defence shall not be an offence. The right to private defence in no case extends to the inflicting of more harm than it is necessary to inflict for the purpose or private defence.
    FACTUAL SITUATION: Rajan saw a thief jumping the boundary wall and entering his house in the night. He picked up the sword and hid in a corner. The moment the person entered the house, he hit the person with sword and cut his head. Did Rajan commit the offence of killing the thief?
    DECISION will be ______.

  • Question 9
    1 / -0

    LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A person can be benefited under private defence in case of intoxication.
    FACTUAL SITUATION: Ram Lal got drunk voluntarily and on his way to his house, he assaulted a policeman.
    Which of the following is correct?

  • Question 10
    1 / -0

    Suppose X and Y were apprehended before administering poison to Z. What is the offence committed by X and Y?

Submit Test
Self Studies
User
Question Analysis
  • Answered - 0

  • Unanswered - 10

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Submit Test
Self Studies Get latest Exam Updates
& Study Material Alerts!
No, Thanks
Self Studies
Click on Allow to receive notifications
Allow Notification
Self Studies
Self Studies Self Studies
To enable notifications follow this 2 steps:
  • First Click on Secure Icon Self Studies
  • Second click on the toggle icon
Allow Notification
Get latest Exam Updates & FREE Study Material Alerts!
Self Studies ×
Open Now