Human Rights in India Test 23

Question 1
1 / -0

Which of the following amendments imposed restrictions on the fundamental rights of the citizens to protect the sovereignty and integrity of the country?

A
The $$14$$th Amendment

B
The $$16$$th Amendment

C
The $$24$$th Amendment

D
The $$39$$th Amendment

Question 2
1 / -0

Who can impose reasonable restrictions on the fundamental rights?

A
Supreme Court.

B
Parliament.

C
President on the advice of the Council of Minister.

D
None of these.

Question 3
1 / -0

Under which article of the constitution can an individual move to high court directly in case of violation fundamental rights?

A
Article 226.

B
Article 32.

C
Article 34.

D
Article 13.

Question 4
1 / -0

Which of the following recognition is temporary and revocable?

A
De jure

B
De facto

C
Precipitate recognition

D
Both (a) and (c)

Question 5
1 / -0

Which of the following statements regarding fundamental duties is correct?

A
Were incorporated by the 42nd amendment.

B
Are incorporated in part IV-A.

C
The number of fundamental duties is 11.

D
All statements are correct.

Question 6
1 / -0

Which of the following are among the fundamental duties as listed in the constitution?

A
To preserve the heritage of our composite culture.

B
To abide by the constitution.

C
To strive for excellence in scientific research to win international fame.

D
To render national service when called upon to do so.

E
All of the above.

Question 7
1 / -0

The Fundamental Rights of a citizen can be suspended.

A
By the Parliament through a law enacted by two-thirds majority

B
By the President during a national emergency

C
By the Supreme Court

D
None of the above

Question 8
1 / -0

Directive principles are ______________________.

A
not justiciable

B
justiciable

C
not justicable but fundamental in the governance of the country

D
are superior to fundamental rights

Question 9
1 / -0

Which of the following is described as the the heart and soul of the Indian constitution?

A
Right to freedom

B
Right to freedom of expression

C
Right to equality

D
Right to Constitutional remedies

Question 10
1 / -0

Factual Situation: In order to ensure that people live in an amicable atmosphere, the Government of India decided to abolish courts and constituted dispute settlement boards. Further to achieve this objective, the law stipulated that lawyers should not be allowed to espouse the claims of parties, and instead their claims be espoused by social workers.

Legal Principles:
I. Any law made by the Parliament that infringes the fundamental rights of the citizens is invalid and unenforceable.
II. Freedom to carry on trade or profession of one's own choice is a fundamental right.
III. The Parliament is competent to impose reasonable restrictions on the exercise of this right.
IV. If the restrictions, on fundamental rights imposed by the Parliament, totally removes or nullifies any fundamental right then it will be construed as an unreasonable restriction.

A
The law made by the Parliament is valid as it does not infringe any fundamental right.

B
The law made by the Parliament is valid even though there is restriction of fundamental right, such a restriction is reasonable.

C
The law made by the Parliament is invalid as it constitutes an infringement of the fundamental rights, and the restriction imposed is not reasonable.

D
None of the above answer is correct.

Submit Test

Human Rights in...

Question 1

The $$14$$th Amendment

The $$16$$th Amendment

The $$24$$th Amendment

The $$39$$th Amendment

Question 2

Supreme Court.

Parliament.

President on the advice of the Council of Minister.

None of these.

Question 3

Article 226.

Article 32.

Article 34.

Article 13.

Question 4

De jure

De facto

Precipitate recognition

Both (a) and (c)

Question 5

Were incorporated by the 42nd amendment.

Are incorporated in part IV-A.

The number of fundamental duties is 11.

All statements are correct.

Question 6

To preserve the heritage of our composite culture.

To abide by the constitution.

To strive for excellence in scientific research to win international fame.

To render national service when called upon to do so.

All of the above.

Question 7

By the Parliament through a law enacted by two-thirds majority

By the President during a national emergency

By the Supreme Court

None of the above

Question 8

not justiciable

justiciable

not justicable but fundamental in the governance of the country

are superior to fundamental rights

Question 9

Right to freedom

Right to freedom of expression

Right to equality

Right to Constitutional remedies

Question 10

The law made by the Parliament is valid as it does not infringe any fundamental right.

The law made by the Parliament is valid even though there is restriction of fundamental right, such a restriction is reasonable.

The law made by the Parliament is invalid as it constitutes an infringement of the fundamental rights, and the restriction imposed is not reasonable.

None of the above answer is correct.

User

Question Analysis

Results Announcement on: coming Monday

Stay Tuned: We’ll update you on your result via email or SMS.