Famous Doctrine...

What doctrine applies when a pre-constitutional law is inconsistent with fundamental rights, making the law dormant but not void ab initio?

Which doctrine empowers the courts to scrutinize the constitutionality of government actions, both legislative and executive, and declare them null and void if they violate the basic principles of the constitution?

Which doctrine allows the removal of the invalid part of a provision, leaving the rest of the provision valid, provided that it does not change the nature or structure of the legislation?

Which doctrine focuses on determining the true nature and character of a law when it touches subjects mentioned in different legislative lists?

Which doctrine comes into play when a legislature indirectly attempts to do something that it cannot do directly within its scope of power?

Which doctrine aims to interpret conflicting provisions of the Constitution in a manner that avoids any head-on clash and gives effect to all provisions as much as possible?

Which doctrine is based on the principle that "whatever legislature cannot do directly, it cannot do indirectly "?

Which doctrine applies when a pre-constitutional law is inconsistent with fundamental rights, rendering the law temporarily dormant but not void, and can become active again if the inconsistency is removed?

Which doctrine allows the courts to interpret conflicting provisions of the Constitution in a manner that avoids contradictions and gives effect to all provisions as much as possible?

Which doctrine empowers the courts to remove the invalid part of a provision while keeping the rest valid, as long as the nature or structure of the legislation is not altered?